In anticipation of the Staff Retreat, here is a list of topics we may want to have cross-team discussions:


0%

Topics

  1. handler

    Standards harmonization planning and impact assessment to SHARE

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 20, 2018
  2. handler

    New structure in upcoming ADaM Validation Checks

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 20, 2018
  3. handler

    TAUG metadata

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 20, 2018
  4. handler

    Agreement in "3D metadata" and "machine-readable"

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 20, 2018
  5. handler

    Managing CDASH and SDTM models together for GGG

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 20, 2018
  6. handler

    Provide an update on CT Relationship subteam's progress

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 20, 2018
  7. handler

    Preread for testable SHARE-compatible conditions

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 20, 2018
  8. handler

    What decision support "thingy" do we need? What kind of metadata will be come out of it?

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 21, 2018
  9. handler

    Next steps for Julie's variance report

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jun 21, 2018
  10. handler

    Decomposing CDISC Notes into appropriate metadata, across all standards

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jul 11, 2018
  11. handler

    Referencing document sections and sub-sections, numbers vs. headers; context is document management and standards browser

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jul 11, 2018
  12. handler

    New set of user stories identifying new capabilities we want to deliver using standards metadata in SHARE

    Priority MEDIUM
    shume@cdisc.org
    Jul 11, 2018
  13. handler

    Review and bless the meta-model

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jul 12, 2018
  14. handler

    Progress update on NSV Registry

    Priority MEDIUM
    achow
    Jul 12, 2018
  • No labels

2 Comments

  1. Sam Hume

    New SHARE user stories could be built around some of the examples you guys added to slack earlier:

    • "give me a custom findings domain whose results are physiologically based, but timepoint isn't relevant." The rendered results will have the full domain spec, with rules, assumptions, etc.

    • "Can SHARE give me all the variables for a custom findings domain?"

    • "Can SHARE give me all the variables that are valid for LB in 3.2?"

    Some of these we could do today (and definitely using the SHARE 2 API)... other's we'll need additional metadata. It's time we start feeding requirements to the standards development teams based on agreed to features we plan to deliver.

  2. Anthony Chow

     Conversation with Kit:

    • Beginning-to-end, standards contributing to quality data, data sharing, unlocking cures through analyzing data
    • Research paper's peer review, peer review committee, quality review
    • Using data summaries to validate assumptions, outliers in outcome measures
    • Business rules in protocol can be used to check data fitness
    • Defining standard that aligns with the data lifecycle process
    • How do we allow users to customize their study manifest (protocol, CSR, monitoring guidelines, etc.) using our standards?