In tobacco studies, subjects may report problems or malfunctions with the device used to deliver the tobacco product, which may or may not result in adverse events. These may be called "events" or "malfunctions." Often the true cause of the issue cannot be determined until a cause analysis is performed. Theses device related issues or events may or may not be a concern for a given trial depending upon whether the device has already been approved by regulators.
The Tobacco Product Events and Malfunctions (EM)) domain is based on the Events General Observation class and is used to represent device issues and/or events.
There is more than one approach to identifying tobacco product devices involved with these events/incidents. The method chosen will depend upon the granularity at which the applicant needs to track the tobacco product devices and will affect how the data are modeled. A tobacco product device can be identified as a single unit or its components can be separately identified. The level of granularity an applicant chooses will be influenced by whether the components will be replaced and/or tracked, and how tobacco product device/adverse event relationships and actions taken will be assessed.
Example
This is an example of a study where the applicant collected issues and events associated with the operation of the electronic cigarette product and any adverse events that a subject experienced as a result of the product issue or event.
These product malfunctions and events are represented in EM. Events not specifically associated with the product device should not be represented in this domain.
The applicant used a standardized or dictionary-derived text for the description of an issue or events. (Note: CDISC does not prescribe what standardized or dictionary-derived text should be used.) The applicant decided to use the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) document terminologies for categorized adverse event reporting for the medical problem codes. The name and version of the dictionary used to map terms must be provided in a Define.XML ExternalCodeList element (see Section 2.10, Standards for Data Exchange).
EMDECOD was the Level 3 IMDRF term. NSVs were used to represent the various coding level variables defined in the dictionary.
Example SUPPEM Variable Metadata
Variable | Label | Type | Codelist |
---|---|---|---|
EMIMDRCD | IMDRF Code | text | IMDRFANNEXA |
EMIMDRFL2 | IMDRF Level 2 | text | IMDRFANNEXA |
EMIMDRFL1 | IMDRF Level 1 | text | IMDRFANNEXA |
Example External Dictionaries
Codelist | External Dictionary Name | Dictionary Version | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
IMDRFANNEXA | IMDRF Terminologies for Categorized Adverse Event Reporting (AER): Terms, Terminology Structure and Codes: Annex A | Release Number: 2022 |
The SDTM EM dataset is shown below.
In this study, subject 3067 had an AE associated with the battery problem. This was reported in the AE dataset. Not all variables are shown below for brevity.
The RELREC dataset was used to record the relationship between the EM dataset and any reported AE represented in the AE dataset.