You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Instructions

Describe each step to be taken to complete the scope of this Work Instruction in the prescribed sequence. Use active verb in the Instructions column.


AccountableMilestoneComments

Stage 0 – Scoping & Planning 

0.1Project ManagerCreate project artifacts (Jira, Wiki)For TAUGs, grant proposal has been signed and project is slated to start
0.2Project Manager Create project plan from templateI think this will be a new action for Alana, normal for Dana except that it comes from a template now which can be added to in 0.5
0.3Project ManagerReview scope

For TAUGs, this includes review of signed off Proposal (eg. 18 months, 10 concepts)


0.4Project Manager

Create project charter Wiki page


Wiki page can contain proposal but high level details should be included on the page. 

Charter page should be from a common template so that all project charters could be exported and seen in a spreadsheet.  

Would it be possible to identify common information that both SD and DS are interested in to create template? That way projects that don't include SD would still be consistent and they'd be able to be reported along with the SD, SD/DS projects.

0..5Project ManagerUpdate project planAt this time additional items are added to Jira plan that was created by the template.
0.6Metadata AnalystReview project plan, scope, and Wiki structures with Project Manager

PM and Metadata Analysts meet at start of the project to make sure both departments aligned, however, PM and Metadata Analysts should continue to review during Stage 1 & 2 and should plan meeting cadence at this time.

0.7Project ManagerSubmit scope to GGG for review

Known scope gets approved by GGG.  

However, in some cases new domains and variables go to GGG as they come up now through development.

0.8GGG LeadGGG approves scopeWhere is the formal project kickoff with the team where the charter/scope, wiki, and team processes reviewed?



  • No labels