Case 1 - Subject has AAA but TAA is not found
The subject had a MRI performed on the torso (trunk).
Questions and Thoughts
I wonder what the LOC truly is in this procedure, or whether you need a value in PRLOC at all, because essentially, you are scanning the subject from the chest to the abdomen. If the scanning is done on the same day in one visit, would you consider the scan of the chest a separate procedure from the scan of the abdomen? For "diagnostic procedures", especially imaging, I think the location where the procedure is done is irrelevant. When we say Chest CT, or Chest MRI, does this mean the CT scan is done on the chest (hence PRLOC = chest), or does it mean that the purpose of the CT scan is to scan and create images of the chest? I think these are two different things.
Questions and Thoughts
Imaging modality for the CV-imaging project:
Coronary angiography:
- Done on the chest area, the probe rotates around the chest of the subject, but there is no such a thing as "chest Coronary angiography", it is simply called Coronary angiography.
- Creates images of the entire coronary artery system
Thransthoracic Echocardiogram (TTE):
- Done on the chest and upper abdominal wall. The transducer is placed on various parts of the chest and upper belly to get different views of the heart. Again, there is no such a thing as chest TTE.
- Creates images of the heart.
Transesophageal Echocardiogram (TEE):
- Done from the inside of the Esophagus.
- Creates images of the heart.
Cine Angiography:
- Done on the chest, again the probe is placed on top of the chest.
- Creates images of the entire coronary artery system.
If we don't record the location for the procedures above, i,e, PRTRT = Coronary angiography, PRLOC = Chest, then why do chest and abdomen go into PRLOC for chest and abdominal CT scans?
A chest CT doesn't mean that a CT is done on the chest, it is a CT scan of the chest, it creates images of the chest, more precisely the thoracic region. If PRTRT = CT Scan, PRLOC = Chest. The way I read this is that the CT scan is done on the chest, which doesn't make sense.
An abdominal CT doesn't mean a CT done on the abdomen, it is a CT scan of the abdomen, it creates images of the abdominal region.
Have I lose my god damn mind????
The MRI scan produced cross-sectional images about the thoracic and abdominal regions of the subject. The evaluator then examined the MRI images of the thoracic region and abdominal region, and found the presence of a large AAA, but the absence of TAA.
Dataset Wrapper Debug Message
Please add a row column to your dataset.
Dataset Wrapper Debug Message
Please add a row column to your dataset.
In the original DUKE data element, the responses provided for TAA and AAA, and all other types of aneurysms all have the responses: present, absent and unknown.
Dataset Wrapper Debug Message
Please add a row column to your dataset.
Case 2 - Subject has both TAA and AAA
The subject had a chest CT scan and an abdominal CT scan.
Are chest and abdomen really location of the procedure? See questions and comments under case 1
Dataset Wrapper Debug Message
Please add a row column to your dataset.
Dataset Wrapper Debug Message
Please add a row column to your dataset.
Questions and Thoughts
The results for TU, TUORRES = target, non-target, or new target. This convention was designed for tumor assessment. Target and non-target have very specific definitions depending on the tumor under study. Generally for solid tumor, according to RECIST:
Measurable lesions - lesions that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension with longest diameter 20 mm using conventional techniques or 10 mm with spiral CT scan.
- All measurable lesions up to a maximum of five lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs should be identified as target lesions and recorded and measured at baseline.
Non-measurable lesions - all other lesions, including small lesions (longest diameter <20 mm with conventional techniques or <10 mm with spiral CT scan), i.e., bone lesions, leptomeningeal disease, ascites, pleural/pericardial effusion, inflammatory breast disease, lymphangitis cutis/pulmonis, cystic lesions, and also abdominal masses that are not confirmed and followed by imaging techniques.
- All other lesions (or sites of disease) should be identified as non-target lesions and should also be recorded at baseline. Measurements of these lesions are not required, but the presence or absence of each should be noted throughout follow-up.
Since TU is also shared by Lesion Identification, to have a result as "target" is misleading and doesn't always apply to non-tumor settings. When you say there is a target aneurysm, what does that mean? Target for treatment and response evaluation? what is the criteria that makes it a target? Usually an aneurysm larger than 5cm requires surgery. Does that mean the ones that are smaller than 5 cm are considered "non-target"? and non-target for what? surgery not needed? The values for TU responses right now, doesn't make sense for non-tumor lesion identification process.
After all this, i struggle with what values should go into TULOC. When a CT scans the chest, it produces cross-sectional images of the thorax. You can view the images in three angles: axial view (you are looking at the picture of the thorax from the direction of head to toe), the coronal view (you are looking at the images of the thorax as if you are standing in front of the person), sagittal view (you are looking at the picture of the thorax from the side). Hence TULOCs are populated with Thoracic Region and Abdominal Region. Especially in the axial view, as you move from cross-section images of the thorax to images of the abdomen, you are looking at sectioned images of the thoracic region to abdominal region.