Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Reverted from v. 30

...

Approach 1: using result location variables

Dataset wrap
titlecv.xpt
NameTU


Rowcaps


Row 1:Shows one or more lesions have been identified in the lower limb region.
Row 2:Shows the limb that contains lesion is the left leg.
Row 3:Shows the major vessel that contains a lesion is the left femoro-popliteal peripheral artery.
Row 4:Shows the lesion is found in the left popliteal artery, in the segment below the knee. Note a TULNKID is created for row 4 ONLY where TULNKID = Lesion 1. This --LNKID is used to connect this lesion to the lesion severity assessment in CV. TULNKID is created in this case as the lesion identifier, it also serves the function to connect the identified lesion to other assessments in different domains.



Dataset2


Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

TUSEQTULNKID

TUTEST

TULOC

TUORRES

TU Result LOCTU Result LATTU Result LOCDTL

TUMETHOD

TUEVEL

VISITNUM

VISIT

TUDTC

1

TUDY01

TU409121
Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONY


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
2

TUDY01

TU409122Lesion 1Lesion Location IdentificationLOWER LIMB REGIONIDENTIFIEDPOPLITEAL ARTERYLEFTABOVE KNEECT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
3

TUDY01

TU409123Graft Lesion 1Lesion Location IdentificationLOWER LIMB REGIONIDENTIFIEDLEFT FEMORO-POPLITEAL GRAFTLEFTPROXIMAL ANASTOMOSIS,  5MM FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE GRAFTCT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07





Pros:
  1. Reusibility of the result location variables in other domains.
  2. Simplicity: there is only one location for TULOC for the Lesion Location Identification process. Imaging location is treated as the general location for TULOC, and all result locations are under the RESLOC variable.
  3. Clarity of data representation
Cons:
  1. there is only one result associated with the location questions.
  2. We currently have DIR, LAT, PORTOT, Loc Detail, how many more variables might we need if there are more locations info that we need to represent. For example, the graft use-case where we need to indicate that a location is a graft, or transplant.
Vote:

...

Approach 3: taking a similar approach as SEND in MI domain modeling where MI test = microscopic examination, the identified abnormality is the result and the location of the said abnormality is mapped to RESLOC.

I think Diane had proposed this approach before but it didn't go anywhere? 

Dataset wrap
titlecv.xpt
NameTU



Dataset2
hi1styleyellow
hi27
hi16
hi2styleaqua
tableidTU1


Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

TUSEQTULNKID

TUTEST

TULOC

TUORRES

TUSTRESCTU Result LOCTU Result LATTU Result LOCDTL

TUMETHOD

TUEVEL

VISITNUM

VISIT

TUDTC

1

TUDY01

TU409121Lesion 1Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONYY


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
2

TUDY01

TU409122Lesion 1Examination for AbnormalityLOWER LIMB REGION
lesion
Lesion
lesion
LesionPOPLITEAL ARTERYLEFTBELOW THE KNEECT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
3

TUDY01

TU409123Lesion 2Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONYY


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
4

TUDY01

TU409124Lesion 2Examination for AbnormalityLOWER LIMB REGIONLesionLesionFemoral ArteryRight
CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
5

TUDY01

TU409121Lesion 1Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONNN


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR8VISIT 82007-10-08
6
LOWER LIMB REGIONlesionlesionFEMORAL ARTERY

TUDY01

TU409122Lesion 2Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONYY


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR8VISIT 82007-10-08
7

TUDY01

TU409123Lesion 2Examination for AbnormalityLOWER LIMB REGIONLesionLesionFemoral ArteryRight
CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR8VISIT 82007-10-08




Dataset wrap
titlecv.xpt
NameTU



Dataset2
hi1styleyellow
hi27
hi16
hi2styleaqua
tableidTU1


Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

TUSEQTULNKID

TUTEST

TULOC

TUORRES

TUSTRESCTU Result LOCTU Result LATTU Result LOCDTL

TUMETHOD

TUEVEL

VISITNUM

VISIT

TUDTC


TUDY01

TU409121
Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONYY


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
1

TUDY01

TU409121Lesion 1Presence of Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONYYPOPLITEAL ARTERYLEFTBELOW THE KNEECT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07

TUDY01

TU409121Lesion 1Presence of Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONNN


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR7VISIT 82007-02-07




Copy:

Dataset wrap
titlecv.xpt
NameTU



Dataset2
hi1styleyellow
hi27
hi16
hi2styleaqua
tableidTU1


Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

TUSEQ

TULNKID

TUTEST

TULOC

TUORRES

TUSTRESCTU Result LOCTU Result LATTU Result LOCDTL

TUMETHOD

TUEVEL

VISITNUM

VISIT

TUDTC

1

TUDY01

TU409121
Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONYY


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
2

TUDY01

TU409122Lesion 1Examination for AbnormalityLOWER LIMB REGIONaneurysmaneurysmPOPLITEAL ARTERYLEFTBELOW THE KNEECT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
3

TUDY01

TU409123Lesion 2Examination for AbnormalityLOWER LIMB REGIONaneurysmaneurysmFemoral ArteryRight
RIGHT

CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR2VISIT 12007-02-07
4

TUDY01

TU409124
Lesion IndicatorLOWER LIMB REGIONYY


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR
9
8VISIT 82007-10-08
5

TUDY01

TU409125Lesion 1Examination for AbnormalityLOWER LIMB REGION
lesion unidentifiable
aneurysm Unidentifiable
lesion unidentifiable
aneurysm Unidentifiable


CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR
9
8VISIT 82007-10-08
6

TUDY01

TU409126Lesion 2Examination for AbnormalityLOWER LIMB REGION
lesion
aneurysm
lesion
aneurysm
FEMORAL ARTERY
Femoral Artery
RIGHT
Right
CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHYINVESTIGATOR
9
8VISIT 82007-10-08
7