Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Pros:
  1. lesion location, location laterality and location details are represented as separate TUTESTs - allowing different results
Cons:
  1. The need to create lesion type-specific tests (e.g. aneurysm, calcified annuls, etc), causing an expansion of TUTESTs. For each lesion type, say aneurysm,   you may create:
    1. aneurysm lesion location ID
    2. aneurysm lesion location laterlaity ID
    3. aneurysm lesion location directionality IDaneurysm location
    4. lesion location portot ID
    5. aneurysm location lesion location detail ID
  2. Reusibility in other domains is limited, seeing as lesion identification should all be mapped to TU.
  3. Requires good understanding of lesion anatomy and the difference between TSTLOC vs RESLOC in order to map the locations properly and correctly for each corresponding test, step wise.
  4. Just a lot of rows...
Vote:

...