Versions Compared

Old Version 12

changes.mady.by.user Jordan Li

Saved on

compared with

New Version 13

changes.mady.by.user Jordan Li

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Pros:
  1. Reusibility of the result location variables in other domains.
  2. Simplicity: there is only one location for TULOC for the Lesion Location Identification process. Imaging location is treated as the general location for TULOC, and all result locations are under the RESLOC variable.
  3. A combination of location-related tests and location variables help to better support complex anatomical data mapping.
  4. Clarity of data representation
Cons:
  1. there is only one result associated with the location questions.
Vote:


Dataset wrap
NameCV


Dataset2


Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

RSSEQCVLNKID

CVTEST

CVCAT

CVORRES

VISITNUM

VISIT

RSDTC

1

TUDY01

CV409121Lesion 1Lesion SeveritySponsor-defined CriteriaSevere2VISIT 12007-02-07



...

Pros:
  1. lesion location, location laterality and location details are represented as separate TUTESTs - allowing different results
Cons:
  1. The need to create lesion type-specific tests (aneurysm, calcified annuls, etc), causing an expansion of TUTESTs.
  2. Reusibility in other domains is limited, seeing as lesion identification should all be mapped to TU.
  3. Requires good understanding of lesion anatomy and the difference between TSTLOC vs RESLOC in order to map the locations properly and correctly for each test, step wise.
Vote: