New IS domain-specific variables

Illustration of variables: 


Variable Short NameVariable Long NameVariable Description and Usage NotesOrder of the VariableControlled TerminologyAdditional Notes
--SCMBCLSecreted Molecule by Cells

Usage: This is a domain specific variable, and qualifies the ISTEST variable.

Description: The textual description of the entity secreted by the cells represented in the ISTEST. The combination of ISTEST and ISSCMBCL should describe "the thing, the entity or the analyte" one is measuring, without the need of additional variables.

It is placed right after BDAGNTNo. Free-text description.

--BDAGNT


Binding Agent


Usage: This is a domain specific variable, and qualifies the ISTEST variable.

Description: The textual description of the agent that's binding to the entity in the ISTEST variable. The ISBDAGNT variable is used to indicate that there is a binding relationship between the entities in the ISTEST and ISBDAGNT variables, regardless of direction.

ISBDAGNT is not a method qualifier. It should only be used when the actual interest of the measurement is the binding interaction between the two entities in ISTEST and ISBDAGNT. In other words, the combination of ISTEST and ISBDAGNT should describe "the thing, the entity or the analyte" one is measuring, without the need of additional variables.

The binding agent may be, but not limited to, a test article, a portion of the test article, a related compound, an endogenous molecule, an allergen or an infectious agent.

It is placed right after ISTEST. (this is used more than SCMBCL)

Yes. Two codelists.

-Microorgansim (MICROORG)

-Binding Agent for Immunogenicity Assessments (ISBDAGT).


--TSTOPO

Test Operational Objective

Usage: This is a domain-specific variable for LB and IS that qualifies the --TEST variable. This is a permissible variable.

Description: The textual description of the high-level purpose of the test at the operational level.

It is placed right after ISTSTDTL.

*When getting this ready for internal review, make sure to add TSTDTL into the IS specification table.

Yes. One codelist.

Codelist Rules: this is a non-extensible codelist and the MB SDS/CT team reserves the right to review future term request to this codelist and decide whether addition of new terms are appropriate.

Controlled Terminology:

-SCREEN: A test whose operational purpose is to determine the presence or absence of a substance or organism.

-CONFIRM: A test whose operational purpose is to verify the presence or absence of a substance or organism.

-QUANTIFY: A test whose operational purpose is to determine the amount or concentration of a substance or organism.

  1. use-case examples for "Quantify" are: measurements of any types of antibody titer (titration), viral load, bacterial colony count, drug toxicity concentration, etc.
  2. drug toxicity concentration: appears often in LOINC mapping. Also see example: https://wiki.cdisc.org/x/Qx3JB


Notes for Variable Name/Description:

  1. Analytical purpose vs operational purpose of a test - there is a difference between the two, analytical purpose is about the analyte itself - what specific analyte are you measuring, which is why in lab we tend to have the analyte name as the LBTEST - LBTEST tells the analyte of interest. The operational purpose/objective of an analyte test is to screen, confirm then quantify the analyte - this represents a different level of purpose, and operational purpose can be applied to any analyte hence it is not analyte-specific.

    Take ADA as an example, ISTEST = Binding Antidrug Antibody, this test tells you that you are looking for ADAs, not, for example, C-reactive proteins. The Screen, Confirm and Quantify then tell you the operational reason, the whys behind each performed ADA test.

  2. REAS (Currently NSV) : it is been proposed to name this variable as REAS/Reasons Done, or at least re-use this variable. This idea is rejected because we want to control this variable with very specific values and use-cases and REAS has been used in many TAUGs with all kinds of values. We do not want to confuse people who are already using REAS.


Controlled Terminology Notes:

Is "Detection" a valid value for this codelist? We had said before that one should use "detection" when one does not know whether the test is for screening or confirmatory, however is this a synonym to screen? look at the definition for screening, how is it different from detection? Confirm is to verify the previously detected substance is present.

  • Sponsor feedback is that "detected" is normally reported as a result hence this value does not belong in this codelist, because both screen and confirm are to detect the analyte, they are test qualifiers.

How about "quantify to confirm", what does that mean, is this also a valid value?

  • Ine mentioned that sometimes you would perform a quantificaiton test to confirm the existence of a substance. In this instance you get a quantitative result which confirms the existence of the substance, from which you normally only report "Positive or Negative" as confirmation. However the PURPOSE of the test is still to confirm the substance, so even though in the process you are using a quantitative method, the high-level purpose is to confirm. In this instance, the correct TSTOPO value to use is still "CONFIRM". Quantitative is an attribute of the method.

Example 1: Tiered Testing of ADA

This example shows the tiered testing of antidrug antibody (ADA). Typical tiered testing scheme for ADA evaluation includes the following steps: screening, confirmatory, and "characterization". In the first tier, all evaluable samples are run in the screen assay. Samples that score positive in the screen assay are then analyzed in a confirmatory assay (tier 2). Samples that are positive for ADA in the screen and confirmatory tiers are reported as positive, while samples that are negative in either tier are reported as negative. Further tiered testing of positive samples frequently includes analysis of antibody titer and neutralizing activity. The variable "TSTOPO" has the following controlled values: SCREEN, CONFIRM and QUANTIFY to describe the operational objective or the reason behind each testing step, and also to provide uniqueness to each row of record. ISGRPID is used in this example to show that the records are related to each other, and in this case, tests are done in a tiered, sequential manner.

Row 1:Shows the screening of the presence of ADA to DRUG AZ-007.
Row 2:Shows the confirmation of the previously detected ADA to DRUG AZ-007.
Row 3:Shows the quantification of the said ADA from the screen and confirmatory steps.
$titleHtml

is.xpt

RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDISSEQISREFID ISGRPIDISTESTCDISTEST

ISBDAGNT

ISTSTOPOISCATISSCATISORRESISORRESUISSTRESCISSTRESN ISSTRESUISSPECISMETHODVISITNUMVISITISDTC
 1 ABCIS  ABC-002 1 V5551

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

DRUG AZ-007

SCREEN

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES

 
HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27
 2 ABC IS ABC-002 2 V5551ADA_BABBinding Antidrug Antibody

DRUG AZ-007

CONFIRM

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIESHUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUMELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27
 3 ABCIS  ABC-002 3 V5551

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

DRUG AZ-007

QUANTIFY

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITY50titer5050titerSERUM ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27
$warningHtml

IS NSV Metadata

Dataset Wrapper Debug Message

Please add a row column to your dataset.

Example 2: Consolidated Reporting of ADA

The example below shows how to represent the various types of antidrug antibody tests (ADA). Of note, while most ADAs do not inhibit the pharmacodynamic activity of the drug, neutralizing antidrug antibodies (NAbs) can inhibit drug activity soon after the drug is administered. However, most ADAs, or rather, the non-NAbs can lower the drug's systemic exposure just as well by increasing the rate of drug clearance, resulting in a clinically similar outcome to that of Nabs – reduced clinical efficacy.

Rows 1-4 in this example show binding antidrug antibody reaction against the administered analogue drug, whereas rows 5-8 show cross-reactive antidrug antibody reaction against the endogenous protein that's structurally similar to the analogue study drug. Both the study drug and the endogenous protein are represented by the IS domain-specific variable "ISBDAGNT", which only qualifies the ISTEST variable. The variable, "ISTSTOPO", is also used in this dataset to describe the purpose of each testing step, and provides uniqueness to each record. ISGRPID is used to show which records are related.


Rows 1-2:Show the confirmation and quantification of binding ADA to coagulation factor VIII analogue drug. A binding antidrug antibody is an antibody that binds to a drug.
Rows 3-4:Show the confirmation and quantification of the neutralizing binding ADA to coagulation factor VIII analogue drug. A neutralizing binding antidrug antibody is a type of ADA that binds to the functional portion of a drug leading to diminished or negated pharmacological activity. The neutralizing ADAs are a subset of the total ADAs.
Rows 5-6:Show the confirmation and quantification of the cross-reactive binding ADA to the endogenous coagulation factor VIII. A cross-reactive binding antidrug antibody is a type of ADA that binds to endogenous molecules, they are also a subset of the total ADAs.
Rows 7-8:Show the confirmation and quantification of the neutralizing cross-reactive binding ADA to the endogenous coagulation factor VIII. A neutralizing cross-reactive binding antidrug antibody is a type of ADA that binds to endogenous molecules and diminishes or negates their function; in some cases, they may also bind and negate the function of the study drug. They are a subset of the total ADAs.
$titleHtml

is.xpt

RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDISSEQISREFIDISGRPIDISTESTCDISTEST

ISBDAGNT

ISCATISSCAT ISORRESISORRESUISSTRESCISSTRESN ISSTRESUISSPECISMETHODVISITNUMVISITISDTC
ISTSTOPO
 1 ABCIS  ABC-001 1A428391

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

COAGULATION FACTOR VIII ANALOGUE DRUG

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES

 
HUMORAL IMMUNITY POSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM 

ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY

 1VISIT 12017-07-27
CONFIRM
 2 ABCIS  ABC-001 2A428391

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

COAGULATION FACTOR VIII ANALOGUE DRUG

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITY30 titer30 30 titerSERUM ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27
QUANTIFY

 3

 ABCIS  ABC-001 3 A428392

ADA_NAB

Neutralizing Binding Antidrug Antibody

COAGULATION FACTOR VIII ANALOGUE DRUG

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM 

HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION ASSAY

 1VISIT 12017-07-27
CONFIRM
 4 ABCIS  ABC-001 4 A428392

ADA_NAB


Neutralizing Binding Antidrug Antibody

COAGULATION FACTOR VIII ANALOGUE DRUG

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITY60 titer60 60 titerSERUM 

HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION ASSAY

 1VISIT 12017-07-27
QUANTIFY
 5 ABCIS  ABC-001 5 A428393

ADA_X

Cross-Reactive Binding Antidrug Antibody

ENDOGENOUS COAGULATION FACTOR VIII

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM  ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27
CONFIRM
 6 ABCIS  ABC-001 6 A428393

ADA_X

Cross-Reactive Binding Antidrug Antibody

ENDOGENOUS COAGULATION FACTOR VIII

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITY360 titer360 360 titerSERUM  ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27
QUANTIFY
 7 ABCIS  ABC-001 7 A428394

ADA_NX

Neutralizing Cross-Reactive Binding Antidrug Antibody

ENDOGENOUS COAGULATION FACTOR VIII

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM 

HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION ASSAY

 1VISIT 12017-07-27
CONFIRM
 8 ABCIS  ABC-001 8 A428394

ADA_NX

Neutralizing Cross-Reactive Binding Antidrug Antibody

ENDOGENOUS COAGULATION FACTOR VIII

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITY360 titer360 360 titerSERUM 

HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION ASSAY

 1VISIT 12017-07-27
QUANTIFY
$warningHtml

IS NSV Metadata

Dataset Wrapper Debug Message

Please add a row column to your dataset.

Example 3 - ADA Reaction Against Drug Components - Breakdown Product

This example shows the production of antidrug antibody in response to both the prodrug and its active metabolite. A prodrug is a compound that, after administration, is metabolized into a pharmacologically active drug. Please note in this example, even though only confirmatory records are reported and shown, it is assumed that the screening step has also been performed.

Rows 1-2:Show the confirmation and quantification of the ADA against the prodrug A.
Rows 3-4:Show the confirmation and quantification of the ADA against the active metabolite of the prodrug A.
$titleHtml

is.xpt

RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDISSEQISREFID ISGRPIDISTESTCDISTESTISBDAGNTISCATISSCATISORRESISORRESUISSTRESCISSTRESN ISSTRESUISSPECISMETHODVISITNUMVISITISDTC
ISTSTOPO
 1 ABCIS  ABC-004 1 J1231

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

PRODRUG A

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES

 
HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27

CONFIRM

 2 ABCIS  ABC-004 2 J1231

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

PRODRUG A

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITY30 titer30 30 titerSERUM ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27
QUANTIFY

 3

 ABCIS  ABC-004 3 J1232

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

PRODRUG A ACTIVE METABOLITE

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27

CONFIRM

 4 ABCIS  ABC-004 4 J1232

ADA_BAB


Binding Antidrug Antibody

PRODRUG A ACTIVE METABOLITE

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITY60 titer60 60 titerSERUM ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY 1VISIT 12017-07-27
QUANTIFY
$warningHtml

IS NSV Metadata

Dataset Wrapper Debug Message

Please add a row column to your dataset.

Example 4 - ADA Reaction Against Drug Components: Multiple Epitopes per Molecule

The example below shows the production of antidrug antibody in response to both the study biologic drug and also to different immunogenic epitopes of the biologic drug. This also captures an example for when the tier stops at screening (interferon beta1a assay) and goes straight into NAB from there. While unusual, it reflects the flexibility of these fields to incorporate multiple options.

A biologic drug may be biotechnology-derived therapeutic proteins (including mAbs) and peptides, some plasma-derived products (e.g., coagulation factor replacement products), and naturally derived proteins (e.g. therapeutic enzymes and toxins).

Row 1:Shows the presence of ADA against the active motabolite (active interferon beta 1a portion) of peginterferon beta-1a.
Rows 2-3:Show the screening and confirmation of ADA against the PEG epitope portion of peginterferon beta-1a.
Rows 4-5:Show the presence and quantification of neutralizing ADA against the whole molecule peginterferon beta-1a.
Row 6:Shows the absence of ADA against the active metabolite (active interferon beta 1a portion) of peginterferon beta-1a.
Rows 7-10:Show the screening, confirmation and quantification of ADA against the PEG epitope portion of peginterferon beta-1a.
$titleHtml

is.xpt

RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDISSEQISREFID ISTESTCDISTESTISBDAGNTISCATISSCATISORRESISORRESU ISSTRESCISSTRESN ISSTRESUISSPECISMETHODVISITNUMVISITISDTC
ISTSTOPO
 1 ABCIS ABC-007 1 A1

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

ACTIVE INTERFERON BETA 1A PORTION OF PEGINTERFERON BETA1A

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES

 
HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM 

IMMUNOASSAY

1VISIT 12017-07-27
SCREEN

 2

 ABCIS ABC-0072 A1

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

PEG PORTION OF PEGINTERFERON BETA1A

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM ELISA1VISIT 12017-07-27
SCREEN
 3 ABCIS ABC-007  A1ADA_BAB Binding Antidrug Antibody PEG PORTION of PEGINTERFERON BETA1AANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES HUMORAL IMMUNITYNEGATIVE 
NEGATIVE 

 SERUMELISAVISIT 1 2017-07-27 

CONFIRM

 4 ABC ISABC-007  A1ADA_NAB Neutralizing Antidrug Antibody PEGINTERFERON BETA1AANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM REPORTER GENE IMMUNOASSAY1VISIT 1 2017-07-27 
SCREEN
 5 ABC ISABC-007  A1ADA_NAB Neutralizing Antidrug Antibody PEGINTERFERON BETA1AANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES HUMORAL IMMUNITY 4.7titer4.7 4.7titerSERUM REPORTER GENE IMMUNOASSAY1VISIT 1 2017-07-27 
QUANTIFY
 6 ABCIS ABC-0086 V4

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

ACTIVE INTERFERON BETA 1A PORTION OF PEGINTERFERON BETA1A

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES

 
HUMORAL IMMUNITYNEGATIVE 
NEGATIVE 

SERUM 

IMMUNOASSAY

1VISIT 12017-08-27
SCREEN

 7

 ABCIS ABC-0087 V4

ADA_BAB

Binding Antidrug Antibody

PEG PORTION OF PEGINTERFERON BETA1A

ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES 

HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

SERUM ELISA1VISIT 12017-08-27
SCREEN
 8 ABCIS ABC-008  V4ADA_BAB Binding Antidrug Antibody PEG PORTION OF PEGINTERFERON BETA1A ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES HUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE 
POSITIVE 

 SERUMELISAVISIT 1 2017-08-27 

CONFIRM

 9 ABC ISABC-008  V4ADA_BAB Binding Antidrug Antibody PEG PORTION OF PEGINTERFERON BETA1A ANTIDRUG ANTIBODIES HUMORAL IMMUNITY40titer40 40titerSERUM ELISA1VISIT 1 2017-08-27 
QUANTIFY
$warningHtml

IS NSV Metadata

Dataset Wrapper Debug Message

Please add a row column to your dataset.

Example 5 - Autoimmune Disease Diagnosis

The example below shows how to represent autoantibody data.

Rows 1-2:Show the screening and quantification of Antinuclear Antibodies, and ISBDAGNT is not populated. This is because, If an antibody test has multiple, unclearly defined/described targets, a pre-coordinated ISTEST should be created and ISBDAGNT should not be populated. In this case extractable nuclear antigens consist of >100 different soluble cytoplasmic and nuclear antigens, the ISBDAGNT variable cannot clearly and appropriately represent the target(s) of this antibody test, therefore the pre-cooirdinated ISTEST of Antinuclear Antibodies is used.
Rows 3-8:Show the screening and quantification of various Sjogren's Syndrome specific autoantibodies.

is.xpt

is.xpt

RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDISSEQISREFIDISGRPIDISTESTCDISTESTISBDAGNTISORRESISORRESUISSTRESCISSTRESNISSTRESUISSPECISMETHODVISITNUMVISITISDTC
ISTSTOPO
1XYZISXYZ12341192837461ANAAntinuclear Antibodies
POSITIVE
POSITIVE

SERUMMULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY1SCREENING2018-06-20
SCREEN
2XYZISXYZ12342192837461ANAAntinuclear Antibodies
340titerPOSITIVE340titerSERUMMULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY1SCREENING2018-06-20
QUANTIFY
3XYZISXYZ12341192837462ATABBinding Autoantibody

SJOGRENS SS-A60

POSITIVE
POSITIVE

SERUMMULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY1SCREENING2018-06-20
SCREEN
4XYZISXYZ12342192837462ATABBinding Autoantibody

SJOGRENS SS-A60

181AU/mL181181AU/mLSERUMMULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY1SCREENING2018-06-20
QUANTIFY
5XYZISXYZ12343192837463ATABBinding AutoantibodySJOGRENS SS-A52POSITIVE
POSITIVE

SERUMMULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY1SCREENING2018-06-20
SCREEN
6XYZISXYZ12344192838823ATABBinding Autoantibody

SJOGRENS SS-A52

51AU/mL5151AU/mLSERUMMULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY1SCREENING2018-06-20
QUANTIFY
7XYZISXYZ12345192838824ATABBinding AutoantibodySJOGRENS SS-BPOSITIVE
POSITIVE

SERUMMULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY1SCREENING2018-06-20
SCREEN
8XYZISXYZ12346192838824ATABBinding Autoantibody

SJOGRENS SS-B

169AU/mL169169AU/mLSERUMMULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY1SCREENING2018-06-20
QUANTIFY
$warningHtml

IS NSV Metadata

Dataset Wrapper Debug Message

Please add a row column to your dataset.


Example 6 - Vaccine Studies

The example below shows how to represent data about vaccine-induced immunological responses, as well immunological data collected during the trial but are not germane to the study vaccine.

Recommended ISCAT values for Vaccine Studies

For vaccine studies, below are the recommended ISCAT and ISSCAT values to provide extra clarity. ISCAT and ISSCAT are not controlled therefore the below values are not mandated.

  1. For immunological data pertaining to the study vaccine : ISCAT = VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITY.
  2. For immunological data that are collected during the trial but are not assessments about the study vaccine: ISCAT= HISTORICAL INFECTION OR PREVIOUS VACCINATION.
  3. For assessments measuring the "induced-antibody response", ISSCAT = HUMORAL IMMUNITY.
  4. For assessments measuring the "induced-cellular response", ISSCAT = CELLULAR IMMUNITY.

Rows 1-2:Show the screening and quantification of "Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody" against the Human Respiratory Syncytial virus (RSV)-epitope B at baseline, prior to the administration of the study vaccine. The ISBDAGNT value of "HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS-EPITOPE B", is the immunogenic target in the study vaccine that could potentially stimulate the production of antibodies. Note the ISCAT value here is STUDY VACCINE-INDUCED IMMUNOGENICITY, even though at this point, study vaccine has not been administered to the subject - this is done purposefully to enable the grouping of baseline and treatment measurements.
Rows 3-4:Show the screening and quantification of "Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody" against the Influenza A virus at baseline. Co-infection of the Human Respiratory Syncytial virus and Influenza A virus is commonly observed in patients hence baseline anti-Influenza A antibody is also measured to see if the subject suffers from influenza infection as well. Please note, since Influenza A is NOT the immunogenic target of interest in the RSV Vaccine Study, the ISCAT is therefore populated with the value "HISTORICAL INFECTION OR PREVIOUS VACCINATION".
Rows 5-6:Show the titer of "Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody" against the RSV-epitope B post-vaccination at visit 1 and 2. These two records show the antibody titers had increased post-vaccination, presumably due to the stimulation from the RSV study vaccine. Note the ISCAT is populated with the value "VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITY".

is.xpt

is.xpt

Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

ISSEQ

ISREFID

ISGRPID

ISTESTCD

ISTEST

ISBDAGNT

ISTSTDTLISTSTOPO

ISCAT

ISSCAT

ISORRES

ISORRESU

ISSTRESC

ISSTRESN

ISSTRESU

ISSPEC

ISMETHOD

VISITNUM

VISIT

ISDTC


ISTSTOPO

1

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

1

13668

1


Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody

HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS-EPITOPE B

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYHUMORAL IMMUNITY

POSITIVE


POSITIVE



SERUM

ELISA

1

BASELINE

2017-05-27


SCREEN

2

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

2

13668

1

Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody

HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS-EPITOPE B

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITY

HUMORAL IMMUNITY

25

titer

25

25titer

SERUM

ELISA

1

BASELINE

2017-05-27


QUANTIFY

3

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

1

13668

2


Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody

INFLUENZA A VIRUS

HISTORICAL INFECTION OR PREVIOUS VACCINATIONHUMORAL IMMUNITYPOSITIVE
POSITIVE

SERUM

ELISA

1

BASELINE

2017-05-27


SCREEN

4

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

2

13668

2


Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody

INFLUENZA A VIRUS

HISTORICAL INFECTION OR PREVIOUS VACCINATIONHUMORAL IMMUNITY120titer120120titer

SERUM

ELISA

1

BASELINE

2017-05-27


QUANTIFY

5

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

1

13668



Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody

HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS-EPITOPE B

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITY

HUMORAL IMMUNITY

90

titer

90

90

titer

SERUM

ELISA

2

VISIT 1

2017-07-27


QUANTIFY

6RSC1230IS

RSV1230-011

213668

Binding Microbial-induced IgG Antibody

HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS-EPITOPE B

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITY

HUMORAL IMMUNITY500titer500500titer

SERUM

ELISA

3VISIT 22017-08-27

QUANTIFY

Dataset Debug Message

There is a duplicate variable (ISTSTOPO) in the dataset.

IS NSV Metadata

Dataset Wrapper Debug Message

Please add a row column to your dataset.

Example 7: Testing of Antibody-secreting Cells

Traditional methods such as ELISA that monitor humoral immune responses after immunization or infection typically only quantify specific antibody titers in serum. These methods do not provide any information about the actual number and location of the immune cells that secrete antibodies or cytokines.

The Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay is a method to detect and quantify analyte-secreting T or B cells. Generally during Elispot testing, a colored precipitate forms and appears as spots at the sites of analyte localization (analytes typically are cytokines or antibodies), with each individual spot representing an individual analyte-secreting cell. The spots can be counted with an automated ELISpot reader system or manually, using a stereomicroscope. The example below shows how to represent the quantification of antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) as the number of spots per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as determined by B-cell ELISpot from a vaccine trial.

The IS domain-specific variable, Secreted Molecule by Cells/SCMBCL, is introduced in the example below to allow flexibility in data representation and post-coordination of the various secreted antibody types and their respective ASCs. This approach liberates the ISTEST variable from having to house pre-coordinated and thus hyper-specific values crafted based on secretion and cell types.


Row 1:Shows the total number of IgG antibody secreting cells (ASCs) from a subject’s blood sample. In this case, ISTEST = Antibody-secreting Cells, where the entity secreted by the cells in ISTEST is represented by the variable, Secreted Molecule by Cells/ISSCMBCL.
Row 2:Shows the number of H1 specific IgG ASCs from the same subject’s blood sample. In this case, ISTEST = Antibody-secreting Cells, where the entity secreted by the cells in ISTEST is in ISSCMBCL as "IgG antibody specific to H1 antigen".
Row 3:Shows the number of H3 specific IgG ASCs from the same subject’s blood sample. In this case, ISTEST = Antibody-secreting Cells, where the entity secreted by the cells in ISTEST is in ISSCMBCL as "IgG antibody specific to H3 antigen".

is.xpt

is.xpt

Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

ISSEQ

ISREFID

ISTESTCD

ISTEST

ISSCMBCL

ISCATISSCAT

ISORRES

ISORRESU

ISSTRESC

ISSTRESN

ISSTRESU

ISSPEC

ISMETHOD

ISDTC

1

INFL456

IS

INF02-01

1

SAMPBL0201

ABSCCL

Antibody-secreting Cells

TOTAL IGG ANTIBODY

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITY

HUMORAL IMMUNITY

2019

SFC/10^6 PBMC

2019

2019

SFC/10^6 PBMC

PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL

ELISPOT

2011-08-08

2

INFL456

IS

INF02-01

2

SAMPBL0201

ABSCCL

Antibody-secreting Cells

INFLUENZA H1-SPECIFIC IGG ANTIBODY

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITY

HUMORAL IMMUNITY

626

SFC/10^6 PBMC

626

626

SFC/10^6 PBMC

PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL

ELISPOT

2011-08-08

3

INFL456

IS

INF02-01

3

SAMPBL0201

ABSCCL

Antibody-secreting Cells

INFLUENZA H3-SPECIFIC IGG ANTIBODY

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITY

HUMORAL IMMUNITY

592

SFC/10^6 PBMC

592

592

SFC/10^6 PBMC

PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL

ELISPOT

2011-08-08

$warningHtml



Dataset Wrapper Debug Message

Please add a row column to your dataset.

Example 8: Testing of Cytokine-secreting Cells

The example below shows data from the vaccine study for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) where the subject is being vaccinated with a viral vector containing RSV Epitope B. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are isolated from the the subject and are tested before (as baseline) and after vaccination in order to investigate whether the circulating PBMCs produce increasing amounts of Interferon gamma after re-stimulating with control or RSV-Epitope B in vitro.

The example below shows how to represent the quantification of cytokine-secreting cells as the number of spots per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as determined by T-Cell ELISpot from a vaccine trial.

Rows 1-2:Show the measurement of Cytokine-secreting Cells (ISTEST) at baseline after stimulation with placebo (row 1) or RSV Epitope B (Row 2) respectively. The type of cytokine-secreting cells that is measured in this record produces Interferon Gamma, which is represented by the ISSCMBCL variable.
Rows 3-4:Show the measurement of Cytokine-secreting Cells (ISTEST) at Visit 1 after stimulation with placebo (row 3) or RSV Epitope B (row 4) respectively. The type of cytokine-secreting cells that is measured in this record produces Interferon Gamma, which is represented by the ISSCMBCL variable.

is.xpt

is.xpt

Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

ISSEQ

ISREFID

ISTESTCD

ISTEST

ISSCMBCL

ISTSTDTLISTSTOPOISCATISSCAT

ISORRES

ISORRESU

ISSTRESC

ISSTRESN

ISSTRESU

ISSPEC

ISMETHOD

VISITNUMVISIT

ISDTC


ISAGSTIM

1

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

1

13668

CYKSCCL

Cytokine-secreting Cells

INTERFERON GAMMA

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYCELLULAR IMMUNITY

5.1

SFC/10^6 PBMC

5.1

5.1

SFC/10^6 PBMC

PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL

ELISPOT

1BASELINE

2017-05-27


NEGATIVE CONTROL

2

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

2

13668

CYKSCCL

Cytokine-secreting Cells

INTERFERON GAMMA

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYCELLULAR IMMUNITY

40.5

SFC/10^6 PBMC

40.5

40.5

SFC/10^6 PBMC

PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL

ELISPOT

1BASELINE

2017-05-27


RSV-EPITOPE B

3

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

3

13668

CYKSCCL

Cytokine-secreting Cells

INTERFERON GAMMA

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYCELLULAR IMMUNITY

6.3

SFC/10^6 PBMC

6.3

6.3

SFC/10^6 PBMC

PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL

ELISPOT

2VISIT 1

2017-08-27


NEGATIVE CONTROL
4RSV1230ISRSV1230-011413668CYKSCCLCytokine-secreting CellsINTERFERON GAMMA

VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYCELLULAR IMMUNITY260.5

SFC/10^6 PBMC

260.5260.5

SFC/10^6 PBMC

PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL

ELISPOT2VISIT 12017-08-27
RSV-EPITOPE B
$warningHtml

IS NSV Metadata

Dataset Wrapper Debug Message

Please add a row column to your dataset.

Example 9 - Microneutralization Assay

In vaccine studies, microneutralization assays are commonly used in vitro assays to quantify viral-specific neutralizing antibodies in the subject’s specimen that can block viral infection in vitro, and so provide output of vaccine efficacy.  

Typically, a subject's serum and the virus of interest are added to in vitro cell cultures. If neutralizing antibodies are present in the serum, those antibodies will bind to the virus and thereby "blocking" and preventing the virus from infecting the cells in the culture plates. By vaccination with a vaccine that induces antibody response, one thus assumes that the quantity of viral-specific antibodies that are able to block viral infection are increased. The neutralization titer is the antiviral antibody titer that blocks viral infection of the cells. The NEUTRALIZING TITER 50% (also known as NT50) in the context of microneutralization assays is defined as the antiviral antibody titer that blocks 50% of viral infection of the cells. Please note that some users may also represent "Neutralizing Titer 50%" as "IC50 titer" or other test descriptors. CDISC recommends housing values such as NT50, IC50 neutralizing titer, etc. in the ISTSTDTL variable.

The example below shows data from the same Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine study where the subject is being vaccinated with a viral vector containing RSV Epitope B. The subject is tested before (baseline) and after vaccination (visits 1 and 2) whether the anti-RSV binding antibodies present in the subject’s serum also have the functionality to neutralize RSV infection in vitro.

*A Neutralizing antibody is defined as antibodies that bind to, block and prevent non-self agents from infecting cells.


is.xpt

is.xpt

Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

ISSEQ

ISREFID

ISTESTCD

ISTEST

ISBDAGNT

ISTSTDTLISTSTOPOISCATISSCAT

ISORRES

ISORRESU

ISSTRESC

ISSTRESN

ISSTRESU

ISSPEC

ISMETHOD

VISITNUMVISIT

ISDTC

1

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

1

13668


Neutralizing Binding Microbial-induced Antibody

RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUSNEUTRALIZING TITER 50%
VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYHUMORAL IMMUNITY

40

titer

40

40

titer

SERUM

MICRONEUTRALIZATION ASSAY

1BASELINE

2017-05-27

2

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

2

13668


Neutralizing Binding Microbial-induced Antibody

RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS

NEUTRALIZING TITER 50%
VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYHUMORAL IMMUNITY

80

titer

80

80

titer

SERUM

MICRONEUTRALIZATION ASSAY

2VISIT 1

2017-07-27

3

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

3

13668


Neutralizing Binding Microbial-induced Antibody

RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS

NEUTRALIZING TITER 50%
VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYHUMORAL IMMUNITY

200

titer

200

200

titer

SERUM

MICRONEUTRALIZATION ASSAY

3VISIT 2

2017-08-27

$warningHtml

Example 10 - Opsonophagocytic Killing Assay

In vaccine trials, the opsonophagocytic killing (OPK) assay is used as a correlate for protection to measure the "functional capacities" of vaccine-induced antibodies. This in vitro assay aids selecting promising vaccines by demonstrating whether the vaccine-induced antibodies drive efficient complement deposition and subsequent opsonophagocytic killing. 

Typically this test is performed by incubating post-immunization sera of a subject with the bacterial strain of interest, phagocytes and complement proteins. If anti-bacterial antibodies are present in the subject's serum, those antibodies will bind to the bacteria together with complement proteins, this subsequently targets the bacteria for opsonization, which is the ingestion and destruction of invading non-self agents by phagocytes. By vaccination, one thus assumes that the quantity of bacterial-specific antibodies are increased, leading to a decreased number of viable bacterial cells in the presence of phagocytes, functional antibodies and complement. The assay read-out is expressed in Opsonization Index (OI) which is calculated using linear interpolation of the serum dilution containing functional antibody killing the desired percentage (usually 50%) of the bacteria, using a pre-specified algorithm.

The example below shows data from a vaccine study for Escherichia Coli (E.Coli) where the subject is being vaccinated with a vector containing E.Coli epitope X. The subject is tested before (baseline, row1) and after vaccination (rows 2-3) whether the vaccine-induced antibodies drive efficient complement deposition and subsequent opsonophagocytic killing of the E.Coli in vitro. The assay read-out is expressed in Opsonization Index (ISTSTDTL), which is a unit-less test.

A functional antibody is defined as antibodies that bind to non-self agents and initiate opsonization (destruction by complement and phagocytes) or active killing of the said non-self agent by other types of cells. Being able to recruit and activate the complement system is the key and definitive nature of a functional antibody.


is.xpt

is.xpt

Row

STUDYID

DOMAIN

USUBJID

ISSEQ

ISREFID

ISTESTCD

ISTEST

ISBDAGNT

ISTSTDTLISTSTOPOISCATISSCAT

ISORRES

ISSTRESC

ISSTRESN

ISSPEC

ISMETHOD

VISITNUMVISIT

ISDTC

1

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

1

13668


Functional Binding Microbial-induced Antibody

ESCHERICHIA COLI – EPITOPE XOPSONIZATION INDEX
VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYHUMORAL IMMUNITY

1

1

1

SERUM

OPSONOPHAGOCYTIC KILLING ASSAY

1BASELINE

2017-05-27

2

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

2

13668


Functional Binding Microbial-induced Antibody

ESCHERICHIA COLI – EPITOPE X

OPSONIZATION INDEX
VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYHUMORAL IMMUNITY

3

3

3

SERUM

OPSONOPHAGOCYTIC KILLING ASSAY

2VISIT 1

2017-07-27

3

RSV1230

IS

RSV1230-011

3

13668


Functional Binding Microbial-induced Antibody

ESCHERICHIA COLI – EPITOPE X

OPSONIZATION INDEX
VACCINE-RELATED IMMUNOGENICITYHUMORAL IMMUNITY

5

5

5

SERUM

OPSONOPHAGOCYTIC KILLING ASSAY

3VISIT 2

2017-09-27

$warningHtml

  • No labels

22 Comments

  1. Example 1 for SDTM IS domain. Team suggests that we create 3 examples; 1 for SDTMIG, 1 for SENDIG 3.0, and 1 for SENDIG 3.1. Team to pick 1 METHOD to use for this example: CHEMILLUMINESCENT IMMUNOASSAY or ELECTROCHEMILLUMINESCENT IMMUNOASSAY (ECLIA) or ELISA or Homogenous Mobility Shift Assay

    For example for SENDIG3.0 - Update the result values; Add VISITDY, ISDTC, ISDY only for timing variables.

    For example for SENDIG3.1 -  Update the result values; Add NOMDY, ISDTC, ISDY only for timing variables.

  2. I updated several things.

    1) a comment on Example 3. There would not be an analyte for the biologic combination.

    2) updated Example 4b to be the peginterferon example where there are two different epitopes being evaluated in BAB but only the intact molecule in NAB. It is also an example of a somewhat unusual testing scheme because part of it predates the consolidation around the 3-tier assay format. (free access to manuscript - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16541956)

     

    Also recommend adding a fourth variable to Test Detail: quasi-quantitation for non-titer methods.

    Classic example of prodrugs are peptides (such as proinsulin) or proenzymes where the larger molecule may be administered for better PK profile, depending on the body machinery to process into active form. While early in development, the processed molecule may be most relevant, a full immunogenicity assessment would eventually also include the prodrug.

  3. For the PEGINTERFERON BETA1A example, I used the methods that I would be most likely have used when creating the SDTM based on my knowledge of the methods. For all of the other examples, I stuck with ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY (published) since a very frequent selection. Other common methods that would be used include: EIA (published), ELISA (published), ENZYME MULTIPLIED IMMUNOASSAY TECHNIQUE (published) FLUORESCENT IMMUNOASSAY (published), IMMUNOASSAY (published) IMMUNOCHEMILUMINOMETRIC ASSAY (published), MICROPARTICLE ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY (published), SINGLE ANTIGEN BEAD-BASED MULTIPLEX ASSAY (published). Honestly, a lot of them feel redundant to me, so it may be helpful to discuss what the subtle differences are with the terminology team. (Depending on how that goes, I might request a more generic MICROPARTICLE IMMUNOASSAY for non-enzyme based).

     

    For NAB assays, ligand-binding assays would be similar.
    There are also enzyme assays that might use: ENZYME LINKED COLORIMETRY (New - don't need this one) (although fluorogenic substrates are more common).
    For cell-based assays, I am working on getting a list for the terminology team to help identify existing or draft new methods. Obviously clotting factors use the HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION ASSAY.

     

    Other methods that I have seen used infrequently are: FLOW CYTOMETRY (published), FLOW MICROSCOPY (published), MULTIPLEXED BEAD BASED IMMUNOASSAY (published), RIA (published). Others I didn't see on the list are Biacore (or Surface Plasmon Resonance), immunoassays using Europium detection, and some of the immunoassay chip methods being developed for multiplex assays. However, I just might not have know what words I was looking for. And of course they could all be viewed as variants of immunoassay.

  4. With regard to units, here are some that could apply to assays I've seen that would fall under the quasi-quantification umbrella (using surrogate reference standard): % inhibition, Absorbance U/mL, AFU, anti-Xa IU/mL (clotting factors again), Antibody Unit, Arbitrary U, variants of Bq/L, BU/mL, cpm, EIA unit, ELISA unit/mL, Enzyme U, variants of IU/mL, variants of mg/mL and ug/mL, Ratio (it is in the list), Titer, variants of U/mL.

     

  5. Miniature descriptions of assays that would want to cover somehow

    Surface plasmon resonance (generic for BIAcore)

    Biolayer interferometry (generic for Octet)

    Enzyme assay using a fluorogenic substrate (generate signal after cleavage)

    Cell proliferation in response to stimulus

    Cell death in response to stimulus

    Variants on the reporter gene theme

    • PCR of the induced mRNA transcription (either endogenous under native promoter or synthetic reporter gene)
    • Immunoassay of the translated protein (either endogenous or synthetic)
    • Fluorescence of GFP (synthetic reporter gene only)
    • Luminescence of luciferase (synthetic reporter gene only)

    The peginterferon beta1a example is a reporter gene immunoassay of translation of an endogenous molecule (specifically MxA) under native promoter region. Citation: White et al, Bioanalysis, 2015, 7:2801-11

  6. ADA background information and modeling challenges:

    1. When a study drug is administered to a subject, the drug may stimulate the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). It is important to know the presence/absence of the ADA as well as its quantification. If the ISTEST is a generic value: ISTEST = Binding Anti-drug Antibody, how do you represent the name of the drug to which the ADA is reacting to? Or should the drug name be pre-coordinated into the TEST?
    2. A subject produces a certain endogenous molecule (e.g. glucagon), when you administer an analogue drug (e.g. Glucagon Analogue) that is structurally similar to the endogenous antigen, the ADA evoked by the analogue drug may cross-react to the endogenous molecule in the subject. There needs to be a variable to represent the specificity of the endogenous molecule an ADA is reacting to as well. The IS domain currently has no standard variables to represent this type of INFO CT-357 - Getting issue details... STATUS .

     

    Microbiology team comments

    AZ, BMS, Merck, and Covance comments: for representing ADAs, these companies have currently pre-coordinated the name of the drug into the TEST, such as "anti-AZ007 antibody". The problem is that the "AZ007" part will change from a company internal compound number, to the drug's generic name then to the trade mark name, hence there are at least 3 naming variations for a single drug, and therefore 3 "anti-xxx antibody" tests. Results would be presence/absence of the ADA and also the titer. However pre-coordinating the drug name into the TEST is NOT preferred. CT-356 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  7. Microbiology team suggestions

    1. From the clinical perspective, the ADA measurements should be represented by the IS domain because immune responses (i.e. antibody production by subject) toward administered drugs are measured, so technically we are assessing the immunogenicity of the drug, and therefore the ADA data should stay in IS instead of LB.
      • The clinical LB/Microbiology team agrees that this data belongs in IS. However, the ADA request is being made by a non-clinical sponsor, and SEND does not recognize the IS domain as a valid domain in SENDIG 3.1 nor 3.0. For the purposes of non-clinical users, they could report ADA data in LB but CDISC will NOT publish controlled terminology for ADA tests in the LBTEST-CD codelist. The codelist is extensible so this non-clinical extension of CT at a company is valid for submission in LB.
    2. The MB team suggests to post-coordinate the name of the test article and ISTEST; generic ISTEST-CDs should be created.
    3. Will NOT use ISSCAT to house the name of the test article; a NSV "Binding Agent/BDAGNT" is proposed to house the name of the test article.
    1. FYI, the PhUSE team is recommending use of LB domain for SENDIG 3.0 and IS domain for SENDIG 3.1 (which allows custom domains). That white paper is under preparation for distribution in the relatively near future.

  8. Many examples include the non-standard variable "Test Mode" which has values like "DETECTION", "CONFIRMATORY TEST" and "QUASI-QUANTIFICATION".  I think the non-standard variable (aka supplemental qualifier) "–REAS", which is already in SDTMIG Appendix C2, might be a better place to represent this information.


    1. If the Test Mode is in supplemental qualification, it would create the appearance of duplicate records in the main table for each sample ID that proceeds past the screening assay. Since knowing this value is essential to integrate the 1-3 results into a single reported value and a key identifier to show which variant of the assay was used, keeping in the main data table is still my preferred approach.

      1. In the currently published model either variable would be a non-standard variable and either variable could be proposed as a new standard variable. I was questioning the name of the variable.  From the values given, it seemed that the variable was being used to indicate why the test was being done, rather than to give a property of the test.

        When any new standard variable is proposed, I think that best practice would be to also proposed a definition for the variable.

        1. Thank you for your feedback. For ADA testing, we frequently use the word "Tier" to designate which step in the process to the final result, but it seemed very field specific. We also considered "Step" but thought that was more vague than "Mode". Do you have any recommendations for the variable name that would be less confusing than "Mode"?

        2. Hi Diane Wold, Joleen White

          The values in question, Screening Test, Confirmatory Test and Qasi-quantification, were originally housed in TSTDTL and were later moved into a different variable TSTMOD (Test mode). The TSTMOD NSV is developed by the Cell Phenotyping (CP) team and i believe, this was also a recommendation originally made by the METHOD subteam. We obtained permission from Craig Zwickl (Method and CP team lead) to use this NSV for the IS domain, its usage in IS is consistent to how it is used in the new CP domain. The CP domain and its new variables are still under development which is why TSTMOD remains as a NSV. The CP team is getting ready to have their examples, new variables, and other domain-related information for GGG review and approval. I am hesitant to ask GGG to approve making TSTMOD standard for IS until the CP team has a chance to show and discuss this variable with the governance team first.

          1. In some of the examples, there seems to be redundancy between TSTMOD values and other data.  For example, "QUASI-QUANTIFICATION" seems to go with tests whose results are expressed as titers,  "SCREENING TEST" and "DETECTION" seem to go with tests whose results are "POSITIVE" or "NEGATIVE", although those results are also used for a test with TSTMOD = "CONFIRMATORY TEST" in examples 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.  In Example 2, rows 1 and 2 seem to be exactly the same except for the value of TSTMOD.  If the same test can be used for two different purposes ("SCREENING TEST" and "CONFIRMATORY TEST"), then this is not a property of the test, but rather of the purpose for which the test is being used.  If that is so, then the decision not to represent this information in TSTDTL is correct. 

            It sounds as though there are often protocols that prescribe a series of tests to establish antibody status. This reminds me of the series of tests described in Section 6.3.3, Vaccine-induced seropositivity, in the TAUG-HIV. If the variable TSTMOD is intended to designate a step in a defined sequence of tests, then I think the definition of the variable will need careful attention.  I think that this sequence of tests would also have to be explained in something like the SDRG, since I assume that these testing protocols vary by analyte and also evolve over time.

  9. The proposed domain-specific variables need some additional metadata, such as their order within the findings qualifiers.

    Should the example be presented showing these as standard variables, rather than supplemental qualifiers?  If these become domain-specific standard variables in some version of the SDTM, then in versions of hte SDTMIG and SENDIG based on that version of the SDTM, they would be standard variables.

  10. Jordan, the above proposal now lacks the test mode variable (or a different name such as TIER). Could you please add back in to ensure that all key variables are captured in the request for public comment?

    1. Hi Joleen,

      I am not sure if you were at the GGG meeting last November where the MB team sought for overall modeling approval for the IS domain updates, during that meeting, the governance team advised against the use of ISTSTDTL to house these three values: Screening Test, Confirmatory Test and Qusi-quantification, the rational being: these values describe testing conditions/steps rather than actual further details of the test, they are inappropriate for TSTDTL. Therefore it was recommended to the MB team to use a different NSV to house the "tier" values. TSTDTL variable definition and usage still need clarification, i think this may also contribute to people's hesitance to put important and distinguishing information in this variable.

      The ISTSTMOD (test mode) NSV is developed by the Cell Phenotyping (CP) team and i believe, this was also a recommendation originally made by the METHOD subteam. We obtained permission from Craig Zwickl (Method and CP team lead) to use this NSV for the IS domain, its usage in IS is consistent to how it is used in the new CP domain. The Cell Phenotyping domain and its new draft variables are still under development which is why TSTMOD remains as a NSV, unfortunately, we can't move NSVs into the main dataset table until they become standard.

      Please let me know if you have more questions,

      Jordan


      1. My remaining concern is that this is a key piece of information needs to differentiate between rows of data. In the absence of a standard variable, the data sets will continue to flag errors for duplicate rows. This is a concern when the absence of the duplicate rows would indicate the true problem. Could we still include that there will be a standard variable, but the name is still being harmonized with the new Cell Phenotyping domain?

        1. You mean add as a known issue? something like "the TSTMOD" variable remains as a NSV currently but efforts are being made to standardize this variable for the IS domain for a future SDTMIG vXXX?"

          I think this is more a process issue rather than modeling, given the CP domain may still change, we'd like to standardize TSTMOD for IS after it is relatively stable (i.e. defined and approved by GGG for CP first at least).

  11. The formatting for the variable ISBDAGT in the header row of IS datasets is currently causing error messages.  Please see the section on highlighting here WIKI | Macros | Dataset to see how to highlight using the macro.  That will eliminate the error messages.

    I spoke to Darcy, who says that highlighting a cell in the header row may be a little tricky. Consult with her if it's not clear from the documentation how to do that.

    1. Thanks Diane! Actually this is the working page for all our historical records and notes. For internal/public review, i will move the examples to the SDTMIG 3.4 WIKI space and make them WIKI/SDTM-complaint - no more highlighting and such. But thanks for checking with Darcy (smile)

  12. Adding a note from Diane about the use of "NULL" in ISBDAGNT when there isn't a single binding agent: I think it should just be blank. When SDTMIG Section 4.2.5 says missing data should be represented by nulls, it means blank, not the text string "NULL".