This is the Wiki edition of the proposed SDTMIG Relationships section entitled "Alternative Representation of Non-Standard Variables", also called the "NSV Proposal". It went to public review as part of Batch 2 for SDTMIG v3.3; and while not included in SDTMIG v3.3, is still under consideration for inclusion in a future version of the SDTMIG. This draft section is intended to be inserted into the SDTMIG as a part of Section 8, before the section entitled "When Not to Use Non-Standard Variables". |
As an alternative to submitting non-standard variables (NSVs) in separate SUPP-- datasets, they may be represented in the parent datasets. This method provides some additional benefits. These include the following:
In order to use the alternative described above, the following implementation rules must be followed:
Example
This is an example of hospitalization data with non-standard variables.
This example shows three hospitalization records, two for Subject 0001, and one for Subject 0002. In the collected data, there are standard variables from the SDTM: Identifiers from Table 2.2.4, Event Qualifiers from Table 2.2.2 of the SDTM, Timing variables from Table 2.2.5. In addition, there are the following non-standard variables:
Non-Standard Variables | |
AERPFL | AE Reported This Episode? |
MEDSFL | Meds Prescribed? |
PROCFL | Procedures Performed? |
PROVNM | Provider Name |
SPUFL | Any Time in Spec. Unit? |
SPUTYP | Specialized Unit Type |
RLCNDF | Visit Related to Study Med Cond.? |
Two methods are shown for the representation and submission of these data: the method of submitting NSVs in SUPPHO and the new method of submitting NSVs in the parent domain.
.