Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
  •  Fill in results and units for rows 6 and 7
  •  Fill in PKCOND values for rows 6 and 7
  •  ANMETH is a "record qualifier" according to Model 2.0 so technically we don't need to add the METHOD variable into PP. There would only be one valid value of PPMETHOD anyway = CALCULATION. (Confirm with Fred)
    •  Rows 4-5 can the values in PPANMETH also in PPCAT? (Because PPCAT is blank)
    •  Should ANMETH be only used for named formulas like how LB is using it?
  •  Remove PPMETHOD from PP specification table if decided not needed.
  •  Review suppPP dataset makes sure it looks ok
  •  Do people use PC/PP domain for compartmental analysis data as well? For CT we don’t control none-NCA values, but that’s CT ONLY, on the domain level, do people use PC/PP for None-NCA data anyway? The new term request from GSK asked for a controlled codelist for PKANMETH but the requested value is actually for compartmental analysis – this suggests to me that folks are using PC/PP for compartmental analysis data. Currently the SDTMIG does not explicitly state that users should only represent NCA data in PC/PP. Better understanding this would help to decide whether we should add ANMETH into PP.

The example below shows how to represent various PK analysis parameters at multiple dose, steady state condition.

...

Dataset wrap
Namepp


Rowcaps


Rows 1-3:Show the "AUC from T1 to T2" measurements for Drug Parent (Row 1), Drug Metabolite 1 (Row 2) and Drug Metabolite 2 (Row 3).
Row 4:

Shows the "Ratio AUC" measurement of Drug Parent Metabolite 1 to Drug Metabolite 1Parent. Instead of pre-corrdinating "Ratio AUC of Drug Parent over Drug Metabolite 1 to Drug Parent" all into the PPTEST, PPANMETH is used to describe the numerator (Drug Parent, PPSEQ Metabolite 1) and the denominator (Drug Metabolite 1, PPSEQ2Parent) values that contribute to the Ratio AUC calculation in PPTEST. This post-coordination approach liberates the PPTEST variable from having to house hyper-specific, pre-coordinated PK parameter values.

Row 5:Shows the "Ratio AUC" measurement of Drug Parent Metabolite 2 to Drug Metabolite 2. Instead of pre-corrdinating "Ratio AUC of Drug Parent over Drug Metabolite 2" all into the PPTEST, PPANMETH is used to describe the numerator (Drug Parent, PPSEQ 1) and the denominator (Drug Metabolite 2, PPSEQ3) values that contribute to the Ratio AUC calculation in PPTEST. This post-coordination approach liberates the PPTEST variable from having to house hyper-specific, pre-coordinated PK parameter values1. Note the PPTEST is Ratio AUC, whereas DRUG METABOLITE 2 TO METABOLITE 1 is in PPANMETH.
Rows 6-7:Show AUC Infinity Obs and AUC Infinity Pred for the DRUG PARENT. Both are calculated using the LIN-LOG TRAPEZOIDAL METHOD which is in PPANMETH.



Dataset2
hi1styleaqua
hi2row 7
hi1row 6
hi2styleaqua
tableidPP EXAMPLE 1


RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDPPSEQPPRFIDPPTESTCDPPTESTPPCATPPSCATPPORRESPPORRESUPPSTRESCPPSTRESNPPSTRESUPPSPECPPANMETHPPFASTPPNOMDYPPRFTDTC
1ABC-123PP123-10011B2222

AUCINT

AUC from T1 to T2DRUG PARENTNCA154.1h*ng/L154.1154.1h*ng/LPLASMA
Y12001-02-01T12:00
2ABC-123PP123-10012B2222

AUCINT

AUC from T1 to T2DRUG METABOLITE 1NCA144.5h*ng/L144.5144.5h*ng/LPLASMA
Y12001-02-01T12:00
3ABC-123PP123-10013B2222AUCINTAUC from T1 to T2DRUG METABOLITE 2NCA294.7h*ng/L294.7294.7h*ng/LPLASMA
Y12001-02-01T12:00
4ABC-123PP123-10014B2222RAAUCRatio AUCDRUG METABOLITE 1NCA1.07
1.071.07
PLASMADRUG METABOLITE 1 (PPSEQ 2) TO DRUG PARENT (PPSEQ 1)Y12001-02-01T12:00
5ABC-123PP123-10015B2222RAAUCRatio AUCDRUG METABOLITE 2NCA0.52
0.520.52
PLASMADRUG METABOLITE 2 (PPSEQ 3) TO DRUG PARENT (PPSEQ 1)TO METABOLITE 1Y12001-02-01T12:00
6ABC-123PP123-10011B2222AUCIFOAUC Infinity ObsDRUG PARENTNCA????520h*ng/L520520h*ng/L?PLASMALIN-LOG TRAPEZOIDAL METHODY1

2001-02-01T12:00

7ABC-123PP123-10012B2222AUCIFPAUC Infinity PredDRUG PARENTNCA????510h*ng/L510510h*ng/L?PLASMALIN-LOG TRAPEZOIDAL METHODY1

2001-02-01T12:00



...

Dataset wrap
Namesupppp



Dataset2


RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDIDVARIDVARVALQNAMQLABELQVALQORIGQEVAL
1ABC-123PP123-1001PPSEQ1PKCONDCondition of PK AnalysisMULTIPLE DOSE, STEADY STATEeDT
2ABC-123PP123-1001PPSEQ2PKCONDCondition of PK AnalysisMULTIPLE DOSE, STEADY STATEeDT
3ABC-123PP123-1001PPSEQ3PKCONDCondition of PK AnalysisMULTIPLE DOSE, STEADY STATEeDT
4ABC-123PP123-1001PPSEQ4PKCONDCondition of PK AnalysisMULTIPLE DOSE, STEADY STATEeDT
5ABC-123PP123-1001PPSEQ5PKCONDCondition of PK AnalysisMULTIPLE DOSE, STEADY STATEeDT
6ABC-123PP123-1001PPSEQ6PKCONDCondition of PK AnalysisMULTIPLE DOSE, STEADY STATEeDT
7ABC-123PP123-1001PPSEQ7PKCONDCondition of PK AnalysisSINGLE DOSEeDT