Revision History

© 2019 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved. 

1 Introduction

This document describes the CDISC implementation of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-Item (HAMD 17) clinical classification.

CDISC does not modify questionnaires, ratings, and scales (QRS) instruments to meet Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization (CDASH) case report form (CRF) standards.

The representation of data collected for this clinical classification is based on the Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide (SDTMIG) Disease Response and Clin Classification (RS) domain model, which can be found on the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/sdtmig.

These specific implementation details for this clinical classification are meant to be used in conjunction with the SDTMIG. All CDISC QRS documentation packages can be found on the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/foundational/qrs.

The CDISC Intellectual Property Policy can be found on the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/about/bylaws.

1.1 Representations and Warranties, Limitations of Liability, and Disclaimers

This document is a supplement to the SDTMIG for Human Clinical Trials and is covered under Appendix F of that document, which describes representations, warranties, limitations of liability, and disclaimers. Please see Appendix F of the SDTMIG for a complete version of this material.

CDISC specifies how to structure the data that has been collected in a database, not what should be collected or how to conduct clinical assessments or protocols.

Although the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has provided input with regard to this supplement, this input does not constitute US FDA endorsement of any particular instrument.

2 Copyright Status

This instrument is in the public domain. CDISC has included the HAMD 17 in the CDISC library of QRS data standards supplements. Hence, CDISC developed RSTESTCD and RSTEST for each item based on the actual text on the clinical classification. There may be many versions of this instrument in the public domain or copyrighted. CDISC has chosen to use this version as the data standard.

The CDISC documentation of this instrument consists of: (1) controlled terminology, (2) standard database structure with examples, and (3) CRF(s) annotated with the CDISC SDTMIG variables with submission values (attach QRS instrument here). (Note: Most copyright approvals allow annotated case report forms; if this is the case with the current instrument, keep item #3 and just remove this note. If however, the copyright agreement does not allow for annotated case report forms, remove item #3 along with this note.)

Note: CDISC Controlled Terminology is maintained by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS). The most recent version should be accessed through the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/terminology.

Reference for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-Item (HAMD 17):

• Hamilton M., Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967; 6(4):278-96. 
  

3 The RS Domain Model

3.1 Assumptions for the RS Domain Model

All assumptions and business rules described in the SDTMIG RS domain are applicable to this supplement. Additional assumptions specific to the HAMD 17 are listed below.

The HAMD 17 is a multiple-choice clinical classification that clinicians may use to assess the severity of major depression. Max Hamilton originally published the scale in 1960 and reviewed and evaluated it in 1966, 1967, 1969, and 1980. The measure, which is designed for adult subjects, rates the severity of symptoms observed in depression such as low mood, insomnia, agitation, anxiety and weight loss. It consists of 17 items, each rated on 3-point, 4-point, or 5-point scale. A total score between 0-53 is also captured.

1. The scale points include a numeric rating (0-2, 0-3, or 0-4) and a definition of what is represented by the rating (e.g., 0 = "Absent.", 2 = "Severe.", 4 = "Incapacitating."). For the HAMD 17, RSORRES is populated with the text description while the numeric rating is represented in the standardized character and numeric result variables RSSTRESC and RSSTRESN.

2. The time period of evaluation for the HAMD 17 is populated in the RSEVLINT field in ISO 8601 format when the evaluation interval can be precisely described as duration. The evaluation interval for the HAMD 17 is the past week (RSEVLINT = "-P1W").

3. The HAMD 17 instrument includes a total score on the CRF that is considered as captured data on the CRF and is not considered as derived in the example below.

   1. If operationally defined by the sponsor, it is the sponsor's responsibility to set the --DRVFL flag based on their eCRF process to derive subtotals and total scores. An investigator-derived score written on a CRF will be considered a captured score and not flagged. When subtotal and total scores are derived by the sponsor, the derived flag (--DRVFL) is set to Y. However, when the subtotal and total scores are received from a central provider or vendor, the value would go into --ORRES and --DRVFL would be null (see SDTMIG Section 4.1.8.1, Origin Metadata for Variables).

4. Question 16 contains 2 components, Part A “Loss of WT According to Patient” and Part B “Loss of WT According to WK Meas”. Only one of these items is answered when administering the HAMD 17 instrument. The unanswered part of is represented with missing data for the RSORRES, RSSTRESC and RSSTRESN variables with RSSTAT = "NOT DONE" and RSREASND = "NO RESPONSE COLLECTED".

   1. “Presence of Data” items missing data rule:

      1. A record is created in qs.xpt for all items.
      2. If the reason for the not done record is known, then --STAT=“NOT DONE” and --REASND=reason provided (e.g., “PREFER NOT TO ANSWER”)
      3. If the reason for the not done record is unknown, then the reason is that the response was not collected (--STAT=“NOT DONE” and --REASND=“NO RESPONSE COLLECTED”

5. Terminology

   1. RSCAT, RSTESTCD, and RSTEST values are included in CDISC Controlled Terminology.

   2. A full list of value sets for the result fields is provided in Section 4, SDTM Mapping Strategy.

3.2 Example for the HAMD 17 RS Domain Model

The HAMD 17 example below shows the terminology used to implement the instrument in the RS domain. This example shows the data for 1 subject collected at the baseline visit for the HAMD 17 instrument. The example uses CDISC Controlled Terminology for RSTESTCD, RSTEST, and RSCAT. All original results are represented with preferred terminology in RSORRES. This result is then transformed into the standard numeric score in RSSTRESN and a character representation of the standard numeric score in RSSTRESC.

...

© 2024 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved. 

1 Introduction

This document describes the CDISC implementation of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-Item (HAMD 17) instrument.

There is no known standard case report form (CRF) available for this instrument. CDISC created this CRF to represent the instrument, which CDISC believes is in the public domain. Based on the reference papers “Guy W, ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976” and “The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: The making of a ‘‘gold standard’’ and the unmaking of a chronic illness, 1960–1980.”, CDISC made a case for using the current CDISC created CRF for the HAMD 17 CDISC standard. This is not an endorsement of the instrument. The creation of this instrument was based on published articles describing the instrument. Sponsors may create this instrument’s CRF using their style guidelines, but they need to maintain the wording and order of the questions/items and responses as described on the CRF. 

The representation of data collected for this instrument is based on the Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide (SDTMIG) Disease Response and Clin Classification (RS) domain model, which can be found on the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/sdtmig.

These specific implementation details for this instrument are meant to be used in conjunction with the SDTMIG. All CDISC questionnaires, ratings, and scales (QRS) documentation packages can be found on the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/qrs.

The CDISC Intellectual Property Policy can be found on the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/about/bylaws.

1.1 Representations and Warranties, Limitations of Liability, and Disclaimers

This document is a supplement to the SDTMIG for Human Clinical Trials and is covered under Appendix F of that document, which describes representations, warranties, limitations of liability, and disclaimers. Please see Appendix F of the SDTMIG for a complete version of this material.

CDISC specifies how to structure the data that has been collected in a database, not what should be collected or how to conduct clinical assessments or implement protocols. CDISC disclaims any liability for your use of this material.

Although the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) has provided input with regard to this supplement, this input does not constitute US FDA endorsement of any particular instrument.

2 Copyright Status

CDISC believes this instrument to be in the public domain, but you should perform your own assessment. CDISC has included the HAMD 17 in the CDISC library of QRS data standards supplements. Hence, CDISC developed RSTESTCD and RSTEST for each item based on the actual text on the instrument. There may be many versions of this instrument. CDISC has chosen to use this version as the data standard.

The CDISC documentation of this instrument consists of: (1) controlled terminology, (2) standard database structure with examples, and (3) CRF(s) annotated with the CDISC SDTMIG variables with submission values.

Note: CDISC Controlled Terminology is maintained by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS). The most recent version should be accessed through the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/terminology/controlled-terminology.

References for the HAMD 17:

• Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23:56–62.

• Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness BY MAX HAMILTON, Department of Psychiatry, University of Lee, Brit. J. soc. Clin. Psychol. (1967), 6, pp. 278-296, Printed in Great Britain.

• Guy W, ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976.

• The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: The making of a ‘‘gold standard’’ and the unmaking of a chronic illness, 1960–1980.

• Assessment Scales in Depression, Mania and Anxiety, Raymond W Lam, MD, FRCPC, Erin E. Michalak, PhD, Richard P Swinson, MD, FRCPsych, FRCPC, Copyright 2005 Taylor & Francis, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.

3 The RS Domain Model

3.1 Assumptions for the RS Domain Model

All assumptions and business rules described in the SDTMIG RS domain are applicable to this supplement. Additional assumptions specific to the HAMD 17 are listed below.

The HAMD 17 is a multiple-choice instrument that clinicians may use to assess the severity of major depression. Max Hamilton originally published the scale in 1960 and revised it in 1967. The measure, which is designed for adult subjects, rates the severity of symptoms observed in depression (e.g., low mood, insomnia, agitation, anxiety, weight loss). It consists of 17 items, each rated on a 3-, 4-, or 5-point scale. A total score between 0-53

1. The original scores include a numeric rating (0-2 or 0-4) and a definition of what is represented by the rating (e.g., 0 = "Absent.", 4 = "Incapacitating."). For the HAMD 17, RSORRES is populated with the text description while the numeric rating is represented in the standardized character and numeric result variables RSSTRESC and RSSTRESN.

2. The time period of evaluation for the HAMD 17 is populated in the RSEVLINT variable in ISO 8601 format when the evaluation interval can be precisely described as duration. The evaluation interval for the HAMD 17 is determined based on the sponsor's stated evaluation interval.

3. Records are created in rs.xpt for every instrument item: 

   1. For items with no data, RSORRES, RSSTRESC, and RSSTRESN are all missing and RSSTAT = "NOT DONE". If the reason is known then that reason is represented in RSREASND (e.g., RSREASND = "PREFER NOT TO ANSWER"). If the reason is unknown, then RSSTAT = "NOT DONE" and RSREASND is missing.  

   2. Items with RSTESTCD = HAMD116A

      Jira
      showSummary false server Issue Tracker (JIRA) serverId 85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45 key QRSSUPP-756

      and HAMD116B have a response of RSORRES = "Not assessed." (RSSTRESC and RSSCTRESN = 3

      Jira
      showSummary false server Issue Tracker (JIRA) serverId 85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45 key ADQRS-332

      ). Subject data for this response is included in the SDTM representation of the data as QSSTAT = "NOT DONE" and QSREASND = "Not assessed.".
   3. Due to the variability of copyright holder and public domain derived subscore and overall score generation processes, records are not included for derived subscores or overall scores that are not provided.

4. Some items on the HAMD 17 may be conditionally branched per the instrument instructions. Item 16 contains 2 components: Part A, which is loss of weight according to the patient, and Part B, which is loss of weight according to weekly measurements. Only 1 of these items is answered when administering the HAMD 17 instrument. A record is created in rs.xpt for all items. The unanswered component is considered conditionally branched in the data and is represented as follows:

   1. QNAM = “RSCBRFL”, QLABEL = “Conditionally Branched Item Flag“, QVAL = “Y” (this is a RS supplemental qualifier variable related to the record).
   2. RSORRES, RSSTRESC, and RSSTRESN are set to null (missing).

5. The HAMD 17 instrument includes an overall score that is considered as captured data on the CRF and is not considered as derived in the example below. This overall score may be submitted in SDTM or derived in the Analysis Data Model (ADaM) per scoring instructions from the refwrence articles.

   1. Subscores and overall scores are represented in--ORRES, --STRESC, and --STRESN.
   2. If subscores or overall scores are received or derived by the sponsor, it is recommended that they are submitted to SDTM and verified in ADaM whenever feasible. It is the sponsors responsibility to do this verification based on the instrument's user manual or instructions from the copyright owner.
   3. For RSTESTCD = "HAMD116A" and "HAMD116B", a response of RSORRES = "Not assessed."

      Jira
      showSummary false server Issue Tracker (JIRA) serverId 85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45 key QRSSUPP-757

      (RSSTRESC and RSSTRESN = 3) is not included in scoring for the HAMD 17.

6. Terminology

   1. RSCAT, RSTESTCD, and RSTEST values are included in CDISC Controlled Terminology.

   2. A full list of value sets for the result fields is provided in Section 4, SDTM Mapping Strategy.

3.2 Example for the HAMD 17 RS Domain Model

The HAMD 17 example below shows the terminology used to implement the instrument in the RS domain. This example shows the data for 1 subject collected at the baseline visit and  visit 2 represented as not being collected for the HAMD 17 instrument. The example uses CDISC Controlled Terminology for RSTESTCD, RSTEST, and RSCAT. All original results, matching the CRF item response text, are represented in QSORRES.This result is then represented as a standard numeric score in QSSTRESN and as a standard character representation in QSSTRESC. The sponsor's evaluation interval for the example is the past week (RSEVLINT = "-P1W").

The table represents the items from the HAMD 17 instrument. Note that visit 2 is represented as a missing visit.