Page History
The Findings About Events or Interventions structure, referred to as the FA Structure in this section, represents collected data about an event or intervention that cannot be represented within an event or intervention record or as a supplemental qualifier to such a record. For example, this may be the case when:
- There are several items which may be grouped together. If so, the FA structure allows the use of FAGRPID, FACAT, or FASCAT to group the items.
- The observation is best represented in a Findings general observation class structure. If so, the FA structure allows the use of FAORRES, FAORRESU, and FAMETHOD for results, units, and methods respectively.
- There are multiple evaluators. If so, the FA structure allows the use of FAEVALID.
The variable --OBJ is unique to the FA Structure and is used with FATESTCD to represent what the topic of the observation is. FATESTCD describes the measurement/evaluation and FAOBJ describes the event or intervention that the measurement/evaluation is about.
...
When collected data will be represented in a qualifier variable and are represented in the FA domain, the name of the variable will be used as the value of FATESTCD (e.g., FATESTCD = "OCCUR" and FATEST = "Occurrence Indicator"). The use of the same names (e.g., OCCUR) for both qualifier variables in the observation classes and FATESTCD is deliberate, but should not lead implementers to conclude that the collection of such data (e.g., occurrence) must
...
be stored in the FA
...
domain. If the data describe the underlying event or intervention as a whole and share its timing, then the data should be stored as a qualifier of the
...
events or interventions record. A record in FA may or may not have a parent record in an
...
Events or
...
Interventions domain. If an FA record does have a parent record, the value in FAOBJ should match the value in --TERM or --TRT, unless the parent domain is dictionary coded or subject to controlled terminology. In such cases, the value represented in
...
FAOBJ
...
will match the value represented in --DECOD.
When to Use the FA Structure
...
Metadataspec | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Naming Findings About DomainsCreating Datasets
Applicants may choose to represent data in a single FA dataset (potentially splitting the FA domain into physically separate datasets following the guidance described in Section 4.1.6, Additional Guidance on Dataset Naming), or separate datasets, assigning , split FA datasets, or in separate datasets with unique custom 2-character domain codes (see examples in Section 6.4.5, Skin Response).
For example, if findings about clinical events and findings about medical history are collected in a study, these could be represented as:
...
.
Metadataspec | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
- The DOMAIN value would be “FA”.
- Variables that require a prefix would use “FA”.
- The dataset names would be the domain name plus up to 2 additional characters indicating the parent domain (e.g., FACE for Findings About Clinical Events, FAMH for Findings About Medical History). This naming convention may be used for an FA domain that has a parent domain even when the study has only 1 FA dataset that is not being split.
- FASEQ must be unique within USUBJID for all records across the split datasets.
- Supplemental qualifier datasets would need to be managed at the split-file level (e.g., suppface.xpt, suppfamh.xpt). Within each supplemental qualifier dataset, RDOMAIN would be "FA".
- If a dataset-level RELREC is defined (e.g., between the CE and FACE datasets), then RDOMAIN may contain up to 4 characters to effectively describe the relationship between the CE parent records and the FACE child records.
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
- Variables that require a prefix would use the 2-character domain code chosen.
|
For the naming of datasets with findings about events or interventions for associated persons, refer to the SDTMIG: Associated Persons (available at https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/sdtm). Pagenav