Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Page properties
Title

Patient Observer Global Impression (PGIOGI)

CDISC Reference

Questionnaire Supplement to the Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide for Human Clinical Trials

QRS Short Name

PGIOGI

QRS Permission StatusPublic Domain
TeamMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) Standards Team and CDISC Questionnaires, Ratings, and Scales (QRS) Subteam
Supplement Version1.0
StatusFINALDRAFT
Date20192024-0304-2008
Notes to ReadersThis supplement is intended to be used with other CDISC User Guides for specific therapeutic/disease areas and follows the CDISC Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide for Human Clinical Trials.

...

Revision History

DateVersion
20192023-0304-20081.0 Final

© 2019 2024 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved. 

...

This document describes the CDISC implementation of the PGI OGI instruments, which include the Patient Observer Global Impression of Severity (PGIOGI-S), the Patient Observer Global Impression of Change (PGIOGI-C), and the Patient Observer Global Impression of Improvement (PGIOGI-I). These instruments are commonly administered in clinical trials and clinical practices. 

The PGI OGI instruments were initially developed based on the original Clinical Global Impression (CGI) instrument described in the ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. As previously noted, both (1) the exact wording used in the global item and (2) the values of both the text and numeric components of the response options historically have been generated by sponsors for each of the 3 PGI OGI instruments as implemented in clinical trials or clinical practices. Therefore, no single, standard case report form (CRF) was developed by CDISC for any of the 3 PGI OGI instruments.

The representation of data collected using the PGI OGI instruments provided in this document is based on the Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide (SDTMIG) QS domain table, which can be found at the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/sdtmig.

The implementation details for this questionnaire (PGIOGI-S, PGIOGI-C, and PGIOGI-I) are meant to be used in conjunction with the Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide (SDTMIG) but are recorded separately because these instruments may be used in a variety of therapeutic areas. CDISC documentation for all questionnaires, ratings, and scales can be found on the CDISC website at:   https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/qrs.

The CDISC Intellectual Property Policy can be found on the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/about/bylaws.

...

CDISC specifies how to structure the data that data that has been collected in a database, not what should be collected nor how to conduct clinical assessments or implement protocols.

Although the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has provided input with regard to this supplement, this input does not constitute FDA endorsement of any particular instrument.

2 Copyright Status

The PGI instruments are all CDISC believes this instrument to be in the public domain. Indeed, there may be many implementations of each PGI instrument in the public domain, but you should perform your own assessment. CDISC has included the PGI instruments of severity, OGI in the CDISC inventory of QRS data standards supplements. Hence, CDISC developed QSTESTCD and QSTEST for each item based on the text on the instrument. There may be many versions of this instrument. CDISC has included the OGI instruments of severity, change, and improvement as part of CDISC data standards

Observer Global Impression (OGI) is a generic modification of the CGI instrument for any disease/condition concept use case.

The CDISC documentation for the PGI OGI instruments consists of: (1) standard values (controlled terminology) for QSTESTCD, QSTEST, and QSCAT; (2) a standardized database structure; and (3) some example response option values for each instrument. For the reasons discussed in Section 1Introduction, CDISC has not developed a standard CRF for any of the 3 PGI OGI instruments to annotate with the CDISC SDTMIG submission values.

Note: CDISC Controlled Terminology is maintained by National Cancer Institute's Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS). The most recent version should be accessed through the CDISC website ( at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/semanticsterminology/controlled-terminology). 

Reference for the OGI

Modified from Guy W, ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare;1976.

3 The QS Domain Model

3.1 Assumptions for QS Domain Model

All assumptions and business rules described in the SDTMIG QS domain are applicable to this supplement. Additional assumptions specific to the PGI follow OGI are listed below.

The PGI is OGI is a multiple-choice, patientobserver-reported questionnaire. Observer can be anyone other than patient or clinician. The PGI OGI consists of 3 separate items for severity, change, and improvement, each rated on a Likert scale based on the user's choice of responses to the items.

However, no No single (e.g., standardized) version of the PGIOGI-S, PGIOGI-C, or PGIOGI-I currently exists. This is because, for each of these 3 instruments, (1) the specific disease/condition, signs related to the disease/condition, function, and/or functional impact of interest is typically referenced in the wording of the global item; and (2) the response option values on these instruments have not been standardized to date. Indeed, it would be extremely difficult to develop standardized versions of these instruments. Therefore, the implementation described in this document is based on the precedent of (1) sponsors using the PGIOGI-S, PGIOGI-C, and PGIOGI-I as distinct instruments; (2) the specific disease/condition, signs related to the disease/condition, function, and/or functional impact of interest typically being referenced in the wording of the global item; and (3) sponsors determining (a) the exact wording used in the global item and (b) the values of both the text and numeric components of the response options. Instead of creating a separate Questionnaire (QS) Supplement supplement for each of the 3 PGI OGI instruments, the approach taken here was to cover all 3 instruments within 1 a single QS Supplement entitled “Patient “Observer Global Impression.”

  1. There currently exist both patient, clinician, and clinician observer versions of the global impression instruments (i.e., PGI and , CGI, OGI, respectively). Patient, clinician, and clinician observer assessments of severity, change, and improvement are to be kept separate with respect to how these data are captured in clinical trials and then submitted to the FDA or other regulatory authority for review. A separate supplement exists for the both PGI and CGI instruments of severity, change, and improvement. 
  2. The PGI, CGI, and CGI OGI instruments are sometimes referred to by other names:
    1. The PGI instruments are sometimes referred to as the “Patient Global Assessment” or “PGA” instruments.
    2. The CGI instruments are sometimes referred to as the “Clinical Global Assessment” or “CGA” instruments.
    3. The OGI instruments are sometimes referred to as the “Observer Global Assessment” or “CGA” “OGA” instruments.
  3. CDISC standards will not be developed for synonymous instruments (e.g., for the PGA, CGA, or CGA OGA instruments) because these instruments do not substantially differ from the analogous PGI, CGI and CGI OGI instruments. Individuals wishing to use the PGA instruments, CGA instrumentsCGA, or OGA instruments or some other synonymous instruments are directed to CDISC standards developed for the PGI, CGI, and CGI OGI instruments.
  4. The 3 PGI OGI instruments (i.e.g., PGIOGI-S, PGIOGI-C, PGIOGI-I) are mutually distinct measures, even when evaluating the same disease/condition within the same clinical study.
  5. Assessments made based on a single point in time should be done using the PGIOGI-S. Assessments made in comparison to earlier time points should be done using either the PGIOGI-C or PGIOGI-I.
  6. Given that (a) the use of the PGI OGI instruments in a wide variety of therapeutic areas and (b) that the wording of the global item is often disease/condition-specific, this supplement aims to define data standards that are perhaps more general or broader than usual and can be used to report data generated by any version of the PGI OGI instruments implemented in clinical studies. Specifically:
    1. QSSCAT (Subcategory for Question) will be used to capture the specific disease/condition and signs related to the disease/condition, function, and/or functional impact of interest being interest being measured.
    2.  Although general conventions exist for both the numeric and text components of the response options of all 3 PGI OGI instruments, the actual values of the response options for each of these instruments may vary and are to be determined by the sponsor. However, regardless of the exact values of the response options:
      1. Response option text is to be stored in QSORRES (Finding in Original Units).
      2. The numeric component of a response option is to be stored in QSSTRESC (Character Result/Finding in Standard Format) and QSSTRESN (Numeric Finding in Standard Units) as character and numeric values, respectively. Example response option values for QSSCAT, QSORRES, QSSTRESC, and QSSTRESN are provided in Section 4, SDTM Mapping Strategy. Please note that the examples provided in this document are not in any way intended to be prescriptive but rather are provided for illustrative purposes.

    3. Note that an instrument is sometimes referred to as the “Patient “Observer Global Impression of Improvement,” or PGIOGI-I, when in fact the instrument is assessing change in either direction and is therefore actually an implementation of the “Patient “Observer Global Impression of Change,” or PGIOGI-C. In true implementations of the PGI OGI-I, the response options only allow patients to report either no change or improvement in the disease/condition, functions, functional impacts, or other aspects of the patient’s experience of the disease/condition.
  7. In the final dataset submitted to the FDA or other regulatory authority for review, records are to be provided for each study subject, at each assessment time point, for each PGI OGI instrument administered. Within each record, the following variables are expected to be populated: QSCAT, QSTESTCD, QSTEST, QSORRES, QSSTRESC, and QSSTRESN. Records for both missing and non-missing data (assessments) should be included.
  8. The CDISC variable QSMETHOD will be used to capture scale type (e.g., Likert scale, verbal rating scales). 
    1. Note that other instruments using the visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric rating scale (NRS) may appear similar to the PGI OGI instruments described in this supplement; however, instruments using either the VAS or the NRS are not the same as the PGI OGI instruments described in this supplement.
  9. The time period of evaluation for the PGI is OGI is populated in the QSEVLINT --EVLINT field in ISO 8601 format (or QSEVINTX--EVINTX, as appropriate)  when when the evaluation interval can be precisely described as duration. The evaluation interval for the PGI is OGI is determined based on the sponsor's stated evaluation interval.

  10. Terminology
    1. QSCAT, QSTESTCD, and QSTEST values are included in CDISC controlled terminology.

    2. An example A full list of response value sets for QSORRES, QSSTRESC, and QSSTRESN fields are the result fields is provided in Section 4, SDTM Mapping Strategy. 

3.2 Example for the

...

OGI QS Domain Model

This PGI example OGI example shows the terminology used to implement the instrument in the QS domain. The example shows the data for 1 subject collected at visits 1 and 2 for 3 PGI instruments OGI instruments and uses CDISC Controlled Terminology for QSTESTCD, QSTEST, and QSCAT. All original responses original results, matching the CRF item response text, are represented with preferred terminology in QSORRES.This result is then transformed into the represented as a standard numeric score in QSSTRESN and as a standard character representation of the standard numeric score in QSSTRESC.

The table represents the items from the OGI instrument.

below illustrates implementation of the PGI instrument dataset qs.xpt. It represents a given subject’s responses to the global questions posed in the 3 PGI OGI instruments at 2 visits. QSSCAT is populated with the specific underlying construct (e.g., “BACK PAIN”) being evaluated. The values of QSORRES, QSSTRESC, and QSSTRESN are determined by the sponsor and are therefore represented here with values of “X”. Note that for a given construct (e.g., “BACK PAIN”), it is neither required nor typical for all 3 PGI OGI instruments to be administered within the same clinical study. All 3 PGI OGI instruments have been included in the example below for illustrative purposes only. QSMETHOD is used to store the type of scale used.

Dataset wrap
Nameqs
Rowcaps
Rows 1-2:

Represent the severity test at visits 1 and 2.

Rows 3-4:Represent the change and improvement tests based on comparison to the subject at visit 1.
Dataset2
RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDQSSEQQSTESTCDQSTESTQSCATQSSCATQSORRESQSSTRESCQSSTRESNQSLOBXFLQSMETHODVISITNUMQSDTC
1STUDYXQS2324-P00011PGI0101OGI0101PGI01OGI01-SeverityPGIOGIBACK PAINXXXXXYLIKERT SCALE 7-POINT12015-06-15
2STUDYXQS2324-P00012PGI0101OGI0101PGI01OGI01-SeverityPGIOGIBACK PAINXXXXX
LIKERT SCALE 7-POINT22015-06-22
3STUDYXQS2324-P00013PGI0102OGI0102PGI01OGI01-ChangePGIOGIBACK PAINXXXXX
LIKERT SCALE 7-POINT22015-06-22
4STUDYXQS2324-P00014PGI0103OGI0103PGI01OGI01-ImprovementPGIOGIBACK PAINXXXXX
LIKERT SCALE 7-POINT22015-06-22

...

This section provides some examples of commonly utilized response option values for each of the 3 PGI OGI instruments (i.e., PGIOGI-S, PGIOGI-C, PGIOGI-I). Please note that these examples are not intended to be prescriptive; they are provided to help clarify some of the concepts and mapping strategies covered in Section 3, The QS Domain Model. The text of the response option selected by a given study subject at a given assessment time point is stored in the SDTM variable QSORRES, and the corresponding numeric score for the selected response option is stored as a numeric value in the SDTM variable QSSTRESN and as a character value in the SDTM variable QSSTRESCThe values of QSORRES, QSSTRESN, and QSSTRESC provided in this section are to be considered as examples only; the actual values of these variables depend on the specific instrument(s) implemented within a given clinical study.

PGI OGI QSTESTCD and QSTEST Controlled Terminology


Instrument 

CDISC Controlled Terminology


QSCATQSCAT

QSTESTCDQSTESTCD

QSTESTQSTEST

PGIOGI-SPGI

OGI

PGI0101OGI0101

PGI01OGI01-Severity

PGIOGI-CPGI

OGI

PGI0102OGI0102

PGI01OGI01-Change

PGIOGI-IPGI

OGI

PGI0103OGI0103

PGI01OGI01-Improvement

QSMETHODQSMETHOD
VERBAL RATING SCALE 4-POINT  
VERBAL RATING SCALE 7-POINT  
LIKERT SCALE 4-POINT
LIKERT SCALE 7-POINT








QSTESTCD = PGI0101 OGI0101   QSTEST = PGI01OGI01-Severity   QSMETHOD = LIKERT SCALE 7-POINT

QSORRES

QSSTRESC

QSSTRESN

Normal

1

1

Borderline

2

2

Mild

3

3

Moderate

4

4

Marked

5

5

Severe

6

6

Extreme

7

7


QSTESTCD = PGI0101 OGI0101   QSTEST = PGI01OGI01-Severity   QSMETHOD = LIKERT SCALE 4-POINT

QSORRESQSORRES

QSSTRESCQSSTRESC

QSSTRESN QSSTRESN

Normal

1

1

Mild

2

2

Moderate

3

3

Severe

4

4


QSTESTCD = PGI0102 OGI0102   QSTEST = PGI01OGI01-Change   QSMETHOD = LIKERT SCALE 7-POINT

QSORRESQSORRES

QSSTRESCQSSTRESC

QSSTRESN QSSTRESN

Very much improved

1

1

Much improved

2

2

Minimally improved

3

3

No change

4

4

Minimally worse

5

5

Much worse

6

6

Very much worse

7

7


QSTESTCD = PGI0102 OGI0102   QSTEST = PGI01OGI01-Change   QSMETHOD = LIKERT SCALE 7-POINT

QSORRESQSORRES

QSSTRESCQSSTRESC

QSSTRESN QSSTRESN

Much worse

-3

-3

Moderately worse

-2

-2

A little worse

-1

-1

No change

0

0

A little better

1

1

Moderately better

2

2

Much better

3

3


QSTESTCD = PGI0103 OGI0103   QSTEST = PGI01OGI01-Improvement   QSMETHOD = LIKERT SCALE 7-POINT

QSORRESQSORRES

QSSTRESCQSSTRESC

QSSTRESN QSSTRESN

No change                                                             

1

1

Almost the same                                                             

2

2

A little better

3

3

Somewhat better

4

4

Moderately better

5

5

Much better

6

6

A great deal better

7

7


End of Document