Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Info
titleInformation for Reviewers

Text in black is part of the template used to create this document and is not revised under CDISC internal or public review. Please review the blue text; this text represents the changes made to the template that are specific to this QRS instrument.

Page properties
Title

Mini-Mental State Examination 2 Standard Version (MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION)

CDISC ReferenceFunctional Test Supplement to the Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide for Human Clinical Trials
QRS Short Name

MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION

QRS Permission StatusApproved
TeamCDISC Questionnaires, Ratings, and Scales (QRS) Subteam
Supplement Version1.0
StatusDRAFT
Date2023-0708-1915
Notes to ReadersThis supplement is intended to be used with other CDISC user guides for specific therapeutic/disease areas and follows the CDISC Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide for Human Clinical Trials.

...

Revision History

DateVersion
2023-0708-19151.0 Draft

© 2023 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved. 

...

CDISC did not modify this QRS instrument to meet Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization (CDASH) case report form (CRF) standards. The PAR provided CRF has updated the item names represented on the CRF that were described in the original reference.

The representation of data collected for this instrument is based on the Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide (SDTMIG) Functional Tests (FT) domain model, which can be found at the CDISC website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/sdtmig.

...

CDISC specifies how to structure the data that data that has been collected in a database, not what should be collected or how to conduct clinical assessments or implement protocols. CDISC disclaims any liability for your use of this material.

...

Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. (PAR), owns the copyright for the MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION instrument and has granted CDISC permission to include this supplement in the CDISC 

Jira
serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
keyQRSSUPP-621
of QRS data standards supplements. PAR will distribute the CDISC supplement package to sponsors when they are approved to use this instrument. Hence, CDISC developed FTTESTCD and FTTEST for each item based on the actual text on the functional test.

The CDISC documentation of this instrument consists of: (1) controlled terminology, (2) standard database structure with examples, and (3) case report form(s) annotated with the CDISC SDTMIG variables with submission values. 

Info
titleInformation for Reviewers

The CRF is attached at the top of the wiki page. When you click the paperclip image, you will find the file for the annotated CRF.

Note: CDISC controlled terminology is maintained by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS). The most recent version should be accessed through the CDISC  website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/terminology/controlled-terminology.

CDISC has developed this documentation at no cost to copyright holder or any additional cost to users of the instrument beyond the normal licenses fees charged by the copyright holder.

CDISC acknowledges R. Bob Smith III, PhD, Chairman and CEO Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., for the approval to implement the MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION as CDISC data standard.

Reference for the MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION:

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189‒198.

Jira
showSummaryfalse
serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
keyQRSSUPP-637

Copyright© 2010 by MinMental LLC, Inc. All rights reserved. Published 2010 by Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. May not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form or by any means without written permission of Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

...

Copyright© 2010 by MinMental LLC, Inc. All rights reserved. Published 2010 by Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. May not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form or by any means without written permission of Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Adapted and reproduced by special permission of the Publisher, Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. (PAR), 16204 North Florida Avenue, Lutz, Florida 33549, from the Mini Mental State Examination-2, by Marshal Folstein, MD and Susan Folstein, MD, Copyright 2010 by Mini Mental LLC, Inc. Published 2010 by Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission of PAR, Inc. The MMSE-2 can be purchased from PAR, Inc., online at www.parinc.com, or by calling (813) 968-3003.

Jira
showSummaryfalse
serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
keyQRSSUPP-638

The CDISC documentation of this instrument consists of: (1) controlled terminology, (2) standard database structure with examples, and (3) case report form(s) annotated with the CDISC SDTMIG variables with submission values. 

Info
titleInformation for Reviewers

The CRF is attached at the top of the wiki page. When you click the paperclip image, you will find the file for the annotated CRF.

Note: CDISC controlled terminology is maintained by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS). The most recent version should be accessed through the CDISC  website at: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/terminology/controlled-terminology.

CDISC has developed this documentation at no cost to copyright holder or any additional cost to users of the instrument beyond the normal licenses fees charged by the copyright holder.

CDISC acknowledges R. Bob Smith III, PhD, Chairman and CEO Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., for the approval to implement the MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION as CDISC data standard.

Reference for the MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION:

  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189‒198

...

  • .
    Jira
    showSummaryfalse
    serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
    serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
    keyQRSSUPP-

...


3 The FT Domain Model

3.1 Assumptions for FT Domain Model

...

MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION is widely used to assess cognitive impairment and its progression over time. It includes It includes 30 tasks that are scored as a 1 for correct answers and 0 for incorrect answers. There is a brief version total raw score (0-16)

Jira
showSummaryfalse
serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
keyQRSSUPP-639
at the bottom of the first page which is the sum of the first 16 tasks. The sum of the full 30 tasks is captured at the bottom of the second page as a total score
Jira
showSummaryfalse
serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
keyQRSSUPP-640
(0-30).
QRSSUPP-640
(0-30). With a standard version that is equivalent to the original MMSE and brief and expanded forms, the MMSE-2 retains clinical utility and efficiency while expanding the original’s usefulness in populations with milder forms of cognitive impairment, including subcortical dementia. The MMSE user manual requires a purchase and could not be obtained, so no statements are made on missing data. ADaM analysis will follow the user manual rules as needed to check against the collected score, based on the rules.

  1.  The scale points include a numeric rating (0-1) and a description of what is represented by the rating (e.g., 0 = "INCORRECT", 1 = "CORRECT"). For the Serial 7s and WORLD questions, the numeric rating is 0-5, and subtotal for either one of the two sets of questions used is represented by FTTESTCD = "MMS204". For the MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION, FTORRES is populated with the text description of "INCORRECT" or "CORRECT". The numeric rating is represented in FTSTRESC and FTSTRESN. The actual result answers to each question are not represented in the dataset; only whether the answer is "CORRECT" or "INCORRECT" is represented

  2. Items are divided into 11 subcategories represented in FTSCAT: "ORIENTATION TO TIME", "ORIENTATION TO PLACE", "REGISTRATION", "ATTENTION AND CALCULATION", "RECALL", "NAMING", "REPETITION", "COMPREHENSION", "READING", "WRITING", and "DRAWING".
  3. Records are created in qs.xpt for every collected item on the instrument

    1. For items with no data, QSORRES, QSSTRESC, and QSSTRESN are all missing and QSSTAT = "NOT DONE". If the reason is known then that reason is represented in QSREASND

     The scale points include a numeric rating (0-1) and a description of what is represented by the rating
    1. (e.g.,

    0
    1. QSREASND = "

    INCORRECT", 1 = "CORRECT"
    1. PREFER NOT TO ANSWER"). If the reason is unknown, then QSSTAT = "NOT DONE" and QSREASND is missing.

    2. Due to the variability of copyright holder and public domain derived score generation processes, records are not included for derived subscores or total scores that are not provided.
  4. The MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION instrument includes a brief version total raw score of the 1st 16 items and a standard version total raw score For the MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION, FTORRES is populated with the text description of "INCORRECT" or "CORRECT". The numeric rating is represented in FTSTRESC and FTSTRESN. The actual result answers to each question are not represented in the dataset; only whether the answer is "CORRECT" or "INCORRECT" is represented.
    The MMSE-2 STANDARD VERSION instrument includes a brief version total score and a standard version total score

    Jira
    showSummaryfalse
    serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
    serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
    keyQRSSUPP-641
    that are considered as captured data on the CRF and are not considered as derived in the example below. These scores may be submitted in SDTM or derived in the Analysis Data Model (ADaM) per scoring instructions from the CRF.
    Jira
    showSummaryfalse
    serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
    serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
    keyQRSSUPP-642641
    that are considered as captured data on the CRF and are not considered as derived in the example below. These scores may be submitted in SDTM or derived in the Analysis Data Model (ADaM) per scoring instructions from the CRF.
    Jira
    showSummaryfalse
    serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
    serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
    keyQRSSUPP-642

    1. Subtotal and total scores are represented in--ORRES, --STRESC, and --STRESN.If operationally defined by the sponsor, it is the sponsor's responsibility to set the --DRVFL flag based on their eCRF process to derive subtotal and total scores. An investigator derived score will be considered a captured score and not flagged. When subtotal and total scores are derived by the sponsor, the derived flag (--DRVFL) is set to "Y". However, when the subtotal and total scores are received from a central provider or vendor, the value would go into --ORRES and --DRVFL would be null (See SDTMIG Section 4.1.8.1, Origin Metadata for Variables).

      Jira
      showSummaryfalse
      serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
      serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
      keyQRSSUPP-643

    2. If scores are received by the sponsor, it is recommended that they are submitted to SDTM and verified in ADaM. It is the sponsors repsonsibility to do this verification based on the instrument's user manual or instructions from the copyright owner.
      Jira
      showSummaryfalse
      serverIssue Tracker (JIRA)
      serverId85506ce4-3cb3-3d91-85ee-f633aaaf4a45
      keyQRSSUPP-644
  5. Terminology:
    1. FTCAT, FTTESTCD, and FTTEST values are included in CDISC controlled terminology.

    2. A full list of value sets for result field is provided in Section 4, SDTM Mapping Strategy.

...