...
3.2 General Points on Representation of Data within the Oncology Disease Response Domains for RECIST 1.1
In RECIST 1.1, a subject's tumors are identified as target tumors, non-target tumors and new tumors. At a specific disease assessment timepoint, the overall response in RECIST 1.1 is based on measurements of target tumors (target response), qualitative assessments of non-target tumors (non-target response) and the appearance of appearance of new tumors. Subjects with at least one target tumor can have overall response of CR (Complete Response (CR), PR (Partial Response), SD (Stable Disease), PD (Progressive Disease) and NE (Not Evaluable). Subjects with only non-measurable disease (i.e., no target tumors) can have overall response of CR (Complete Response), NonNON-CR/NonNON-PD, PD (Progressive Disease) and NE (Not Evaluable).
Target tumors are measured in the longest diameter except when the location is a lymph node, then they are measured in the longest perpendicular. The examples in this disease response supplement use TRTESTCD = "LDIAM" (Longest Diameter) for measurements of non-lymph node target tumors and TRTESTCD = "LPERP" (Longest Perpendicular) for measurements in the longest perpendicular of lymph node target tumors. The SDTMIG examples have previously used TRTESTCD = "DIAMETER" (Diameter) for measurements of both lymph nodes and non-lymph nodes. Either representation is acceptable for RECIST 1.1. The latter approach requires looking at the anatomical location in conjunction with the TRTESTCD to know whether the diameter was measured in the longest diameter or the longest perpendicular. The "LDIAM" and "LPERP" tests provide more specificity in the TRTESTCD itself and does not required looking to the anatomical location. In addition, "LDIAM" and "LPERP" are tests used in other disease response criteria so the use of these two tests provides standardization that work across criteria for the same measurement. Some sponsors prefer the approach used within this disease response supplement due to these reasons.
...
RECIST 1.1 recommends a standardized value of 5 mm is used in the calculation of sum of diameters when a target tumor is too small to measure. Note that this imputation should only be done when the lesion diameter is too small to measure. When a numerical value is given for the lesion diameter, then that value will be used even if the diameter is less than 5 mm. The original or collected value "TOO SMALL TO MEASURE" should be represented in the TRORRES variable and the standardized value should be represented in the TRSTRESC and TRSTRESN variables. For absent non-lymph node target tumors, 0 mm is used in the calculation of the target sum. The longest perpendicular measurements of lymph node target tumors which are pathological (>= 10 mm) or non-pathological (< = 10 mm) are included in the target sum.
...
In TR, the TRDTC is populated with the date of tumor/lesion assessment/measurement, i.e., the date of the scan, image, or physical exam. The In the examples, the summary results (e.g., Sum of Diameter) do not have TRMETHOD and TRDTC associated with them. However, if an appropriate TRDTC is available, it can be populated. Also, scans which are not performed do not have a TRDTC populated. Symptomatic c deterioration may be collected in studies using RECIST 1.1 but it is not part of an objective RECIST 1.1 response. See example 4.3 for a detailed example for representing these data.
...
4 Examples for the Oncology Disease Response Domains Model for RECIST 1.1
4.1 Example 1: RECIST 1.1 example to show investigator response (RS) data and the underlying tumor identification (TU), tumor results (TR),
...
and procedure (PR
...
) data.
...
The example shows the case where lymph nodes are selected as target lesions. The tumor identifier is in TULNKID and matches TRLNKIDs in the TR Domain. The image identifiers are in TUREFID and TRREFID in the TU and TR domains, respectively, and they match the image identifiers in PRREFID in the PR Domain.
4.1.1 RS Domain Model
The rs.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the RS domain. This example shows the data for one subject collected at the week 6, week 12 and subsequent 8-week follow-up visits.
...
The tu.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the TU domain. This example shows the data for one subject at screening and at weeks 36 and 44 where new lesions are identified. In this example, lymph nodes are selected as target tumors. In RECIST 1.1, target lymph node tumors are measured in the longest perpendicular (TRTESTCD = "LPERP" and TRTEST = "Longest Perpendicular") in the TR domain. The image identifier is in TUREFID and matches a PRREFID in the PR Domain.
...
Dataset wrap |
---|
|
Rowcaps |
---|
Rows 1-3: Show the scans performed at screening. The results of the scans are in TU and TR. Rows 4-6: Show that the MRI and CT scan were performed (PROCCUR = "Y") and that the medical photography was not performed (PROCCUR = "N") at week 6. Rows 7-22: Show the scans performed at weeks 12, 20, 28, 36 and 44. The results of the scans are in TU and TR. In row 22, a non-RECIST 1.1 method was used and this example shows a way to represent the additional scan in PR, i.e., "ULTRASOUND".
|
Dataset2 |
---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | PRSEQ | PRREFID | PRLNKGRP | PRTRT | PRPRESP | PROCCUR | PRLOC | EPOCH | VISITNUM | VISIT | PRSTDTC | PRSTDY |
---|
1 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 1 | IMG-00001 | A1 | MRI | Y | Y | HEAD AND NECK | SCREEN | 10 | SCREENING | 2010-01-01 | -3 | 2 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 2 | IMG-00002 | A1 | CT SCAN | Y | Y | CHEST | SCREEN | 10 | SCREENING | 2010-01-02 | -2 | 3 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 3 | IMG-00003 | A1 | PHOTOGRAPHY | Y | Y | SKIN OF THE TRUNK | SCREEN | 10 | SCREENING | 2010-01-03 | -1 | 4 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 4 | IMG-00004 | A2 | MRI | Y | Y | HEAD AND NECK | TREATMENT | 40 | WEEK 6 | 2010-02-15 | 43 | 5 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 5 | IMG-00005 | A2 | CT SCAN | Y | Y | CHEST | TREATMENT | 40 | WEEK 6 | 2010-02-16 | 44 | 6 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 6 |
| A2 | PHOTOGRAPHY | Y | N | SKIN OF THE TRUNK | TREATMENT | 40 | WEEK 6 |
|
| 7 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 7 | IMG-00007 | A3 | MRI | Y | Y | HEAD AND NECK | TREATMENT | 60 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 8 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 8 | IMG-00008 | A3 | CT SCAN | Y | Y | CHEST | TREATMENT | 60 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-30 | 86 | 9 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 9 | IMG-00009 | A3 | PHOTOGRAPHY | Y | Y | SKIN OF THE TRUNK | TREATMENT | 60 | WEEK 12 | 2010-04-01 | 87 | 10 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 10 | IMG-00010 | A4 | MRI | Y | Y | HEAD AND NECK | TREATMENT | 80 | WEEK 20 | 2010-05-27 | 144 | 11 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 11 | IMG-00011 | A4 | CT SCAN | Y | Y | CHEST | TREATMENT | 80 | WEEK 20 | 2010-05-28 | 145 | 12 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 12 | IMG-00012 | A4 | PHOTOGRAPHY | Y | Y | SKIN OF THE TRUNK | TREATMENT | 80 | WEEK 20 | 2010-05-30 | 147 | 13 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 13 | IMG-00013 | A5 | MRI | Y | Y | HEAD AND NECK | TREATMENT | 100 | WEEK 28 | 2010-07-23 | 201 | 14 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 14 | IMG-00014 | A5 | CT SCAN | Y | Y | CHEST | TREATMENT | 100 | WEEK 28 | 2010-07-24 | 202 | 15 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 15 | IMG-00015 | A5 | PHOTOGRAPHY | Y | Y | SKIN OF THE TRUNK | TREATMENT | 100 | WEEK 28 | 2010-07-25 | 203 | 16 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 16 | IMG-00016 | A6 | MRI | Y | Y | HEAD AND NECK | TREATMENT | 120 | WEEK 36 | 2010-09-17 | 257 | 17 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 17 | IMG-00017 | A6 | CT SCAN | Y | Y | CHEST | TREATMENT | 120 | WEEK 36 | 2010-09-17 | 257 | 18 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 18 | IMG-00018 | A6 | PHOTOGRAPHY | Y | Y | SKIN OF THE TRUNK | TREATMENT | 120 | WEEK 36 | 2010-09-17 | 257 | 19 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 19 | IMG-00019 | A7 | MRI | Y | Y | HEAD AND NECK | TREATMENT | 140 | WEEK 44 | 2010-11-14 | 313 | 20 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 20 | IMG-00020 | A7 | CT SCAN | Y | Y | CHEST | TREATMENT | 140 | WEEK 44 | 2010-11-15 | 314 | 21 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 21 | IMG-00021 | A7 | PHOTOGRAPHY | Y | Y | SKIN OF THE TRUNK | TREATMENT | 140 | WEEK 44 | 2010-11-16 | 315 | 22 | EX11111 | PR | 90001 | 22 | IMG-00022 | A7 | ULTRASOUND |
|
| PELVIS | TREATMENT | 140 | WEEK 44 | 2010-11-16 | 315 | |
|
...
This example shows a situation where the Investigator provided the summary values for Target lesions as a group (TRGRPID = "TARGET"). The TRTESTCD = "SUMDIAMDIAM" is used for the assessments. Note that the sponsor should not derived these values if they were not part of the data capture.
...
The supprs.xpt table below shows the data on the reason that the response was NE (Not Evaluable (NE) (QNAM = "REASNE") in the case where it is collected.
...
Dataset wrap |
---|
|
Rowcaps |
---|
Rows 1-2: Show the Target Response (RSTESTCD = "TRGRESP") and Overall Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") of complete response CR (CRComplete Response) at week 8. The subject only has one target lesion and no non-targets. The Non-target Response Response (RSTESTCD = "NTRGRESP") is not applicable and a record may be included to represent this, if desired. Rows 3-4: Show an unscheduled response assessment which was done to confirm the complete response ("CR"). The RSLNKGRP differentiates the assessment and the VISIT is "UNSCHEDULED WEEK 13". Rows 5-6: Show Target Response (RSTESTCD = "TRGRESP") of not evaluable ("NE") and Overall Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") of not evaluable ("NE") due to an unreadable image. |
Dataset2 |
---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | RSSEQ | RSLNKGRP | RSTESTCD | RSTEST | RSCAT | RSORRES | RSSTRESC | RSEVAL | EPOCH | VISITNUM | VISIT | RSDTC | RSDY | 1 | EX55555 | RS | 90005 | 1 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | CR | CR | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 3 | WEEK 8 | 2007-02-27 | 56 | 2 | EX55555 | RS | 90005 | 2 | A2 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | CR | CR | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 3 | WEEK 8 | 2007-02-27 | 56 | 3 | EX55555 | RS | 90005 | 3 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | CR | CR | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 4.1 | UNCHEDULED WEEK 13 | 2007-04-03 | 91 | 4 | EX55555 | RS | 90005 | 4 | A3 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | CR | CR | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 4.1 | UNCHEDULED WEEK 13 | 2007-04-03 | 91 | 5 | EX55555 | RS | 90005 | 5 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | NE | NE | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 5 | WEEK 16 | 2007-04-24 | 112 | 6 | EX55555 | RS | 90005 | 6 | A5 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | NE | NE | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 5 | WEEK 16 | 2007-04-24 | 112 | 7 | EX55555 | RS | 90005 | 7 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | PD | PD | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 7 | WEEK 24 | 2009-06-19 | 168 | 8 | EX55555 | RS | 90005 | 8 | A5 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | PD | PD | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 7 | WEEK 24 | 2009-06-19 | 168 | |
|
...
The supprs.xpt table below shows the data on the reason that the response was NE (Not Evaluable (NE) (QNAM = "REASNE") in the case where it is collected.
...
Dataset wrap |
---|
|
Rowcaps |
---|
Rows 1-3: Show the week 6 response assessment for a subject with non-target disease only. The Target Response (RSTESTCD = "TRGRESP") is not applicable for subjects with non-target disease only. This can be represented as RSSTAT = "NOT DONE" and RSREASND = "Subject does not have target lesions". The Non-Target Response (RSTESTCD = "NTRGRESP") is non complete response/non progressive disease (NON-CR/NON-PD). The Overall Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") is non complete response/non progressive disease (NON-CR/NON-PD) which is a valid Overall Response in RECIST 1.1 for subjects with non-target disease only. Rows 4-6: Show the week 12 response assessment for a subject with non-target disease only. The Non-Target Response (RSTESTCD = "NTRGRESP") is not evaluable NE (NENot Evaluable) because not all non-target lesions were evaluated and none of the evaluated non-targets showed progression. The brain did not show progression and the assessments of the non-target lesions in the skeletal muscle tissue and pericardium were not done because the non-target lesions were obscured on the MRI and not assessable. Therefore, the Overall Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") is "NE" (not evaluable). Note that "NE" is a valid Overall Response value per the RECIST 1.1 criteria which means it that RSORRES is "NE" rather than represented in RSSTAT. Rows 7-9: Show the week 20 assessment where the non-targets were enlarged from a previous smallest size. The Non-Target Response (RSTESTCD = "NTRGRESP") is "PD" (progressive disease) which results in an Overall Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") of "PD". |
Dataset2 |
---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | RSSEQ | RSLNKGRP | RSTESTCD | RSTEST | RSCAT | RSORRES | RSSTRESC | RSEVAL | EPOCH | VISITNUM | VISIT | RSDTC | RSDY | RSSTAT | RSREASND | 1 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 1 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 |
|
| INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 40 | WEEK 6 | 2010-02-18 | 46 | NOT DONE | Subject does not have target lesions | 2 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 2 |
| NTRGRESP | Non-Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | NON-CR/NON-PD | NON-CR/NON-PD | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 40 | WEEK 6 | 2010-02-18 | 46 |
|
| 3 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 3 | A2 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | NON-CR/NON-PD | NON-CR/NON-PD | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 40 | WEEK 6 | 2010-02-18 | 46 |
|
| 4 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 4 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 |
|
| INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 60 | WEEK 12 | 2010-04-02 | 88 | NOT DONE | Subject does not have target lesions | 5 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 5 |
| NTRGRESP | Non-Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | NE | NE | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 60 | WEEK 12 | 2010-04-02 | 88 |
|
| 6 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 6 | A3 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | NE | NE | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 60 | WEEK 12 | 2010-04-02 | 88 |
|
| 7 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 7 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 |
|
| INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 80 | WEEK 20 | 2010-05-27 | 144 | NOT DONE | Subject does not have target lesions | 8 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 8 |
| NTRGRESP | Non-Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | PD | PD | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 80 | WEEK 20 | 2010-05-27 | 144 |
|
| 9 | EX77777 | RS | 90007 | 9 | A4 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | PD | PD | INVESTIGATOR | TREATMENT | 80 | WEEK 20 | 2010-05-27 | 144 |
|
| |
|
...
The supprs.xpt table below shows the data on the reason that the response was NE (Not Evaluable (NE) (QNAM = "REASNE") in the case where the reason is collected.
...
Dataset wrap |
---|
|
Rowcaps |
---|
Rows 1-3: Show the response assessments at week 12. The target lesion showed 59% decrease from screening so the Target Response Response (RSTESTCD = "TRGRESP") is a partial response (RSSTRESC = "PR"). In the protocol, scintigraphy is only to be performed every 6 months or in order to verify complete response CR (CRComplete Response). Therefore, the Non-target Response (RSTESTCD = "NTRGRESP") is not evaluable (RSSTRESC = "NE") because scintigraphy of the bone was not performed at week 12, i.e., not all non-target lesions were evaluated. The Overall Response Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") is a partial response (RSSTRESC = "PR") based on the target lesions and protocol requirements. Rows 4-6: Show the response assessments at week 24 where the target lesion and the non-target lesions were absent. The Target Response (RSTESTCD = "TRGRESP"), Non-target Response (RSTESTCD = "NTRGRESP") and Overall Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") are complete response CR (CRComplete Response). |
Dataset2 |
---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | RSSEQ | RSLNKGRP | RSTESTCD | RSTEST | RSCAT | RSORRES | RSSTRESC | RSNAM | RSEVAL | RSEVALID | EPOCH | VISITNUM | VISIT | RSDTC | RSDY | 1 | EX88888 | RS | 90008 | 1 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | PR | PR | VENDOR1 | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 2 | EX88888 | RS | 90008 | 2 |
| NTRGRESP | Non-Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | NE | NE | VENDOR1 | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 3 | EX88888 | RS | 90008 | 3 | R-A2 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | PR | PR | VENDOR1 | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 4 | EX88888 | RS | 90008 | 4 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | CR | CR | VENDOR1 | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-24 | 172 | 5 | EX88888 | RS | 90008 | 5 |
| NTRGRESP | Non-Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | CR | CR | VENDOR1 | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-24 | 172 | 6 | EX88888 | RS | 90008 | 6 | R-A3 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | CR | CR | VENDOR1 | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-24 | 172 | |
|
...
Dataset wrap |
---|
|
Rowcaps |
---|
Rows 1-4: Show the measurements of the "R-T01" target tumor in the "LIVER" and the assessments of the 2 non-target lesions "R-NT01" and "R-NT02" in the "BONE" and "PLEURAL CAVITY" at screening. Rows 5-11: Show the measurement of the "R-T01" target tumor and the tumor state of the "R-NT02" non-target in the "PLEURAL CAVITY" at week 12. In the protocol, "SCINTIGRAPHY" is only to be performed every 6 months or in order to verify a complete response CR (CRComplete Response). Therefore, the "SCINTIGRAPHY" of "R-NT01" non-target in the "BONE" was not performed at week 12 (TRSTAT = "NOT DONE" and TRREASND = "SCAN NOT PERFORMED"). Rows 12-18: Show at week 24, the "R-T01" target lesion was absent (i.e., DIAMETER = "0") and the non-targets R-"NT01" and "R-NT02" in the "BONE" and "PLEURAL CAVITY" were absent (TRTESTCD = "TUMSTATE" with TRORRES = "ABSENT"). The "SCINTIGRAPHY" was performed in order to verify the Overall Response of complete response CR (CRComplete Response). |
Dataset2 |
---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | TRSEQ | TRGRPID | TRREFID | TRLNKGRP | TRLNKID | TRTESTCD | TRTEST | TRORRES | TRORRESU | TRSTRESC | TRSTRESN | TRSTRESU | TRSTAT | TRREASND | TRNAM | TRMETHOD | TREVAL | TREVALID | EPOCH | VISITNUM | VISIT | TRDTC | TRDY | 1 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 1 | TARGET | IMG-00001 | R-A1 | R-T01 | LDIAM | Longest Diameter | 17 | mm | 17 | 17 | mm |
|
| VENDOR1 | CT SCAN | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | SCREEN | 10 | SCREENING | 2010-01-02 | -2 | 2 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 2 | TARGET |
| R-A1 |
| SUMDIAM | Sum of Diameter | 17 | mm | 17 | 17 | mm |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | SCREEN | 10 | SCREENING | 2010-01-02 | -2 | 3 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 3 | NON-TARGET | IMG-00002 | R-A1 | R-NT01 | TUMSTATE | Tumor State | PRESENT |
| PRESENT |
|
|
|
| VENDOR1 | SCINTIGRAPHY | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | SCREEN | 10 | SCREENING | 2010-01-01 | -3 | 4 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 4 | NON-TARGET | IMG-00001 | R-A1 | R-NT02 | TUMSTATE | Tumor State | PRESENT |
| PRESENT |
|
|
|
| VENDOR1 | CT SCAN | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | SCREEN | 10 | SCREENING | 2010-01-02 | -2 | 5 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 5 | TARGET | IMG-00004 | R-A2 | R-T01 | LDIAM | Longest Diameter | 7 | mm | 7 | 7 | mm |
|
| VENDOR1 | CT SCAN | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 6 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 6 | TARGET |
| R-A2 |
| SUMDIAM | Sum of Diameter | 7 | mm | 7 | 7 | mm |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 |
|
| 7 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 7 | TARGET |
| R-A2 |
| ACNSD | Absolute Change From Nadir in Sum of Diameter | -10 | mm | -10 | -10 | mm |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 |
|
| 8 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 8 | TARGET |
| R-A2 |
| PCBSD | Percent Change From Baseline in Sum of Diameter | -59 | % | -59 | -59 | % |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 |
|
| 9 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 9 | TARGET |
| R-A2 |
| PCNSD | Percent Change From Nadir in Sum of Diameter | -59 | % | -59 | -59 | % |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 |
|
| 10 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 10 | NON-TARGET |
| R-A2 | R-NT01 | TUMSTATE | Tumor State |
|
|
|
|
| NOT DONE | SCAN NOT PERFORMED | VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 |
|
| 11 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 11 | NON-TARGET | IMG-00004 | R-A2 | R-NT02 | TUMSTATE | Tumor State | PRESENT |
| PRESENT |
|
|
|
| VENDOR1 | CT SCAN | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 12 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 12 | TARGET | IMG-00005 | R-A3 | R-T01 | LDIAM | Longest Diameter | 0 | mm | 0 | 0 | mm |
|
| VENDOR1 | CT SCAN | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-23 | 171 | 13 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 13 | TARGET |
| R-A3 |
| SUMDIAM | Sum of Diameter | 0 | mm | 0 | 0 | mm |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 |
|
| 14 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 14 | TARGET |
| R-A3 |
| ACNSD | Absolute Change From Nadir in Sum of Diameter | -17 | mm | -17 | -17 | mm |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 |
|
| 15 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 15 | TARGET |
| R-A3 |
| PCBSD | Percent Change From Baseline in Sum of Diameter | -100 | % | -100 | -100 | % |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 |
|
| 16 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 16 | TARGET |
| R-A3 |
| PCNSD | Percent Change From Nadir in Sum of Diameter | -100 | % | -100 | -100 | % |
|
| VENDOR1 |
| INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 |
|
| 17 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 17 | NON-TARGET | IMG-00006 | R-A3 | R-NT01 | TUMSTATE | Tumor State | ABSENT |
| ABSENT |
|
|
|
| VENDOR1 | SCINTIGRAPHY | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-24 | 172 | 18 | EX88888 | TR | 90008 | 18 | NON-TARGET | IMG-00005 | R-A3 | R-NT02 | TUMSTATE | Tumor State | ABSENT |
| ABSENT |
|
|
|
| VENDOR1 | CT SCAN | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-23 | 171 | |
|
...
Dataset wrap |
---|
Rowcaps |
---|
Rows 1-3: Show the Target Response (RSTESTCD = "TRGRESP"), Non-Target Response (RSTESTCD = "NTRGRESP") and Overall Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") at week 12. The Target Response of partial response PR (PRPartial Response) is based on the Percent Change From Baseline in Sum of Diameter (PCBSD) of -59%. The Non-Target Response of stable disease SD (SDStable Disease) is based on the judgement of the non-target lesions/tumors taken collectively. In this case at week 12, one of the non-targets is absent and one of the non-targets has enlarged from nadir. The Overall Response is partial response PR (PRPartial Response). Rows 4-6: Show the Target Response (RSTESTCD = "TRGRESP"), Non-Target Response (RSTESTCD = "NTRGRESP") and Overall Response (RSTESTCD = "OVRLRESP") at week 24. The Target Response of complete response CR (CRComplete Response) is based on the Percent Change From Baseline in Sum of Diameter (PCBSD) of -100%. The Non-Target Response of stable disease SD (SDStable Disease) is based on the judgement of the non-target lesions/tumors taken collectively. In this case at week 24, one of the non-targets is absent and one of the non-targets is still present. The Overall Response is partial response PR (PRPartial Response). |
Dataset2 |
---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | RSSEQ | RSLNKGRP | RSTESTCD | RSTEST | RSCAT | RSORRES | RSSTRESC | RSNAM | RSEVAL | RSEVALID | EPOCH | VISITNUM | VISIT | RSDTC | RSDY | 1 | EX01010 | RS | 90010 | 1 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | PR | PR | RADIOL. INC. | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 2 | EX01010 | RS | 90010 | 2 |
| NTRGRESP | Non-Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | SD | SD | RADIOL. INC. | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 3 | EX01010 | RS | 90010 | 3 | R-A2 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | PR | PR | RADIOL. INC. | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 20 | WEEK 12 | 2010-03-29 | 85 | 4 | EX01010 | RS | 90010 | 4 |
| TRGRESP | Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | CR | CR | RADIOL. INC. | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-23 | 171 | 5 | EX01010 | RS | 90010 | 5 |
| NRGRESP | Non-Target Response | RECIST 1.1 | SD | SD | RADIOL. INC. | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-23 | 171 | 6 | EX01010 | RS | 90010 | 6 | R-A3 | OVRLRESP | Overall Response | RECIST 1.1 | PR | PR | RADIOL. INC. | INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR | RADIOLOGIST | TREATMENT | 30 | WEEK 24 | 2010-06-23 | 171 | |
|
...
The tu.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the TU domain. This example shows the data for one subject at screening and at weeks 36 and 44 where new lesions are identified. In this example, lymph nodes are selected as target tumors. In RECIST 1.1, target lymph node tumors are measured in the longest perpendicular (TRTESTCD = "LPERP" and TRTEST = "Longest Perpendicular"). The image identifier is in TUREFID and matches a PRREFID in the PR Domain.
...