Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

I wanted to revisit this discussion on ANA pattern reporting. We also deal with testing labs where they pre-coordinate the pattern result into the test name and perform a call of whether the pattern is observed or not. For example, the 'test' the lab performs evaluates each staining pattern as listed below:

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Centromere Pattern, Char

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Centrosome Pattern, Char

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Cytoplasmic Pattern, Char

Then, the result for each of these tests is 'POSITIVE' or 'NEGATIVE', affirming presence or identity of the specific pattern in question. 

...

For modeling pre-specified finding in MB, the approach has been:

  • When asking an open-ended “what bug do you have in the culture” question,  MBTEST = Microbial Organism Identification; MBORRES = Name of the Microorg (from the Microorg codelist).
  • When asking for a pre-specified finding “do you have this particular named bug in the culture” type question, MBTEST = Name of the specific Microorg, MBORRES = positive/negative, present/absent.

The MB example is to illustrate that the result of an open-ended question becomes the test or a test qualifier for the pre-specified findings question. This modeling principle applies consistently in IS as well.

...