Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The rs.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the RS domain. This example shows the response data for one subject collected at the at the week 8 and subsequent 8-week follow-up visits. 

...

The tr.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the TR domain. This example to show shows the use of the acceptance flag to identify records when multiple assessments are performed by independent assessors (Radiologist 1 and Radiologist 2) for the same timepoint using RECIST 1.1. It is not expected that the TUACPTFL flag would be populated by the sponsor. That type of record selection or censoring would by part of the analysis dataset.

...

The rs.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the RS domain. This example shows investigator response data using RECIST 1.1 for a subject that has only target tumors at screening. This includes an unscheduled assessment.  

...

The rs.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the RS domain. This example shows investigator response data using RECIST 1.1 and the independent radiologist's response data using bi-dimensional and volumetric measurements

Dataset wrap
Namers
Rowcaps

Rows 1-6: Show response assessments at cycle 2 and cycle 3 from the investigator following RECIST 1.1. 

Rows 7-8: Show response assessments at cycle 2 and cycle 3 from the independent radiologist using protocol specified response criteria based on volumetric measurements (RSCAT = "PROTOCOL DEFINED RESPONSE CRITERIA").

Dataset2
RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDRSSEQRSLNKGRPRSTESTCDRSTESTRSCATRSORRESRSSTRESCRSNAMRSEVALRSEVALIDRSACPTFLEPOCHVISITNUMVISITRSDTCRSDY
1EX66666RS900061
TRGRESPTarget ResponseRECIST 1.1SDSD
INVESTIGATOR

TREATMENT3Cycle 2 Day 12007-01-2828
2EX66666RS900062
NTRGRESPNon-Target ResponseRECIST 1.1NON-CR/NON-PDNON-CR/NON-PD
INVESTIGATOR

TREATMENT3Cycle 2 Day 12007-01-2828
3EX66666RS900063A2OVRLRESPOverall ResponseRECIST 1.1SDSD
INVESTIGATOR

TREATMENT3Cycle 2 Day 12007-01-2828
4EX66666RS900064
TRGRESPTarget ResponseRECIST 1.1SDSD
INVESTIGATOR

TREATMENT4Cycle 3 Day 12007-02-2656
5EX66666RS900065
NTRGRESPNon-Target ResponseRECIST 1.1NON-CR/NON-PDNON-CR/NON-PD
INVESTIGATOR

TREATMENT4Cycle 3 Day 12007-02-2656
6EX66666RS900066A3OVRLRESPOverall ResponseRECIST 1.1PDPD
INVESTIGATOR

TREATMENT4Cycle 3 Day 12007-02-2656
7EX66666RS900067R1-A2OVRLRESPOverall ResponsePROTOCOL DEFINED RESPONSE CRITERIASDSDACME VENDORINDEPENDENT ASSESSORRADIOLOGISTYTREATMENT3Cycle 2 Day 12007-01-2828
8EX66666RS900068R1-A3OVRLRESPOverall ResponsePROTOCOL DEFINED RESPONSE CRITERIAPDPDACME VENDORINDEPENDENT ASSESSORRADIOLOGISTYTREATMENT4Cycle 3 Day 12007-02-2656

...

The tu.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the TU domain. The example shows investigator tumor identification, tumor results, and response data using RECIST 1.1 and the independent radiologist's tumor identification, tumor results, and response data using bi-dimensional and volumetric measurements. The example shows example shows the identification of a new tumor where the investigator identified the new tumor only and the independent assessor identified and measured it. The tumor The tumor identifier is in TULNKID and matches TRLNKIDs in the TR TRLNKIDs in the TR Domain. 

Dataset wrap
Nametu
Rowcaps

Rows 1-5: Show the identification of three target lesions "T01", "T02" and "T03", and 2 non-target lesions "NT01" and "NT02" by investigator.

Rows 6-7: Show the identification of two target lesions "R-T01" and "R-T02" by the independent radiologist.

Row 8: Shows the identification of a new tumor "NEW01" by investigator.

Row 9: Shows the identification of a new tumor "R-NEW01" by independent radiologist.

Dataset2
RowSTUDYIDDOMAINUSUBJIDTUSEQTULNKIDTUTESTCDTUTESTTUORRESTUSTRESCTUNAMTULOCTULATTUDIRTUMETHODTUEVALTUEVALIDTUACPTFLEPOCHVISITNUMVISITTUDTCTUDY
1EX66666TU900061T01TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationTARGETTARGET
OCCIPITAL LOBELEFTANTERIORMRIINVESTIGATOR

SCREEN1SCREENING2007-01-011
2EX66666TU900062T02TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationTARGETTARGET
OCCIPITAL LOBERIGHT
MRIINVESTIGATOR

SCREEN1SCREENING2007-01-011
3EX66666TU900063T03TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationTARGETTARGET
TEMPORAL LOBELEFT
MRIINVESTIGATOR

SCREEN1SCREENING2007-01-011
4EX66666TU900064NT01TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationNON-TARGETNON-TARGET
FRONTAL LOBERIGHT
MRIINVESTIGATOR

SCREEN1SCREENING2007-01-011
5EX66666TU900065NT02TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationNON-TARGETNON-TARGET
CEREBELLUMLEFT
MRIINVESTIGATOR

SCREEN1SCREENING2007-01-011
6EX66666TU900066R-T01TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationTARGETTARGETACME VENDOROCCIPITAL LOBERIGHTANTERIORMRIINDEPENDENT ASSESSORRADIOLOGISTYSCREEN1SCREENING2007-01-011
7EX66666TU900067R-T02TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationTARGETTARGETACME VENDORTEMPORAL LOBELEFT
MRIINDEPENDENT ASSESSORRADIOLOGISTYSCREEN1SCREENING2007-01-011
8EX66666TU900068NEW01TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationNEWNEW
FRONTAL LOBERIGHT
MRIINVESTIGATOR

TREATMENT4Cycle 3 Day 12007-02-2656
9EX66666TU900069R-NEW01TUMIDENTTumor IdentificationNEWNEWACME VENDORFRONTAL LOBERIGHT
MRIINDEPENDENT ASSESSORRADIOLOGISTYTREATMENT4Cycle 3 Day 12007-02-2656

...

The tr.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the TR domain. This example shows investigator and independent radiologist's tumor results and the .  The independent radiologist's tumor results using are based on bi-dimensional and volumetric measurements. The example also includes the situation where new tumors are measured by the independent radiologist.

...

The rs.xpt table below shows the terminology used to implement RECIST 1.1 in the RS domain. This example to shows RECIST 1.1 non-target and overall responses for a subject who did not have target lesions at baseline (target response is not applicable). This example also shows a "NE" overall response due to an unreadable image.  

...