...
Question: Can we use LOC for Graft locations? LOC in most findings domains is supposed to be the location where a test is performed, and RESLOC is where a result is collected. SDTM does not specify that the location needs to be a "naturally occurring" body part, so can we get away with mapping graft locations into LOC/RESLOC? Just a thought, I am OK with using a NSV as well.
Dataset wrap |
---|
|
Rowcaps |
---|
Row 1: | Shows one or more lesions have been identified in the lower limb region. |
---|
Row 2: | Shows the location of the lesion in the native vessel. |
---|
Row 3: | Shows the location of the lesion is in the FEMORO-POPLITEAL graft. |
---|
|
Dataset2 |
---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | TUSEQ | TULNKID | TUTEST | TULOC | TUORRES | TUSTRESC | TU Result LOC | TU Result LAT | TU Result LOCDTL | TUMETHOD | TUEVEL | VISITNUM | VISIT | TUDTC |
---|
1 | TUDY01 | TU | 40912 | 1 |
| Lesion Indicator | LOWER LIMB REGION | Y | Y |
|
|
| CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHY | INVESTIGATOR | 2 | VISIT 1 | 2007-02-07 |
---|
2 | TUDY01 | TU | 40912 | 2 | Lesion 1 | Lesion Location Identification | LOWER LIMB REGION | IDENTIFIED | IDENTIFIED | POPLITEAL ARTERY | LEFT | ABOVE KNEE | CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHY | INVESTIGATOR | 2 | VISIT 1 | 2007-02-07 |
---|
3 | TUDY01 | TU | 40912 | 3 | Graft Lesion 1 | Lesion Location Identification | LOWER LIMB REGION | IDENTIFIED | IDENTIFIED | LEFT FEMORO-POPLITEAL GRAFT | LEFT | PROXIMAL ANASTOMOSIS, 5MM FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE GRAFT | CT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAPHY | INVESTIGATOR | 2 | VISIT 1 | 2007-02-07 |
---|
|
|
...