...
| Dataset wrap |
|---|
|
| Rowcaps |
|---|
| Row 1: | I measured the diameter of the aneurysm from aortic arch to the descending aorta (test location)thoracic aortic aneurysm where LNKID = Aneurysm 1. |
|---|
| Row 2: | I measured the diameter of the infrarenal aortic (test location) aneurysmthe abdominal aortic aneurysm where LNKID = Aneurysm 2. |
|---|
|
| Dataset2 |
|---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | TRSEQ | TRLNKID | TRTEST | TRORRES | TRORRESU |
|---|
TRLOC | TRLOCDTL | TRMETHOD | VISITNUM | VISIT | CVDTC |
|---|
| 1 | ABC | TR | ABC-123 | 1 | Aneurysm 1 |
|---|
Aneurysm Thoracic AortaAortic Arch to Descending aorta | | CT SCAN | 1 | BASELINE | 2020-04-27 | | 2 | ABC | TR | ABC-123 | 2 | Aneurysm 2 |
|---|
Aneurysm Infrarenal aortaproximal to the iliac bifurcation | | CT SCAN | 1 | BASELINE | 2020-04-27 |
|
|
The dissected descending aorta (LNKID =Dissection 1) is classified based on the Stanford Aortic Dissection System as type B.
...
| Info |
|---|
| title | Questions and Thoughts |
|---|
|
Again, is there a PRLOC for the MRI procedure? You are scanning the subject from the chest to the abdomen. If the scanning is done on the same day in one visit, would you consider the scan of the chest a separate procedure from the scan of the abdomen?from the chest to the abdomen. |
| Dataset wrap |
|---|
|
| Dataset2 |
|---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | PRSEQ | PRTRT | PRLOC | VISIT |
|---|
| 1 | ABC | PR | ABC-456 | 1 | MRI | Trunk?? or not needed period?
| BASELINE |
|---|
|
|
The MRI scan produced cross-sectional images of the thoracic and abdominal regions of the subject. The evaluator then examined the MRI images of the thoracic region and abdominal region, and found the presence of a large AAA, and an aneurysm in the left renal artery, but the absence of TAA.
...
| Dataset wrap |
|---|
|
| Rowcaps |
|---|
| Row 1: | I measured the diameter of the aneurysm in the left renal artery (test location)aneurysm where LNKID = Aneurysm 1. |
|---|
| Row 2: | I measured the diameter of the aneurysm in the Infrarenal Aorta (test location)the abdominal aortic aneurysm where LNKID = Aneurysm 2. |
|---|
|
| Dataset2 |
|---|
Row | STUDYID | DOMAIN | USUBJID | TRSEQ | TRLNKID | TRTEST | TRORRES | TRORRESU | TRLOC | TRLAT | TRMETHOD | VISITNUM | VISIT | TRDTC |
|---|
| 1 | ABC | TR | ABC-456 | 1 | Aneurysm 1 | Aneurysm Diameter | 3 | cm | Renal Artery | Left | MRI | 1 | BASELINE | 2020-04-27 |
|---|
| 2 | ABC | TR | ABC-456 | 2 | Aneurysm 2 | Aneurysm Diameter | 5 | cm | Infrarenal Aorta | MRI | 1 | BASELINE | 2020-04-27 |
|---|
|
|
The problem with the way TU is set up now, which is originally designed for tumor identification and response evaluation, and you only care about "already identified tumors", is that it only allows the creation of only positive records. It doesn't allow the creation of a "pertinent negative" record. If I were to model case 2 in TU the way TU is designed now, I would lose the ability to represent the negative record for the Thoracic Region as shown above because an aneurysm is not identified in this region. This is also in part, due to the fact that the location where an object is found, is mapped to PRLOC instead of TULOC, thusly not allowing the representation of imaging location in findings.
...